Posted on 03/02/2018 2:42:42 AM PST by smileyface
With the clearly unethical and most likely criminal behavior of the upper management levels of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) exposed by Chairman Devin Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee, there are two complementary areas that have been conveniently swept under the rug.
The first deals with the murder of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) staffer Seth Rich, and the second deals with the alleged hacking of the DNC server by Russia. Both should be of prime interest to special counsel Robert Mueller, but do not hold your breath.
The facts that we know of in the murder of the DNC staffer, Seth Rich, was that he was gunned down blocks from his home on July 10, 2016. Washington Metro police detectives claim that Mr. Rich was a robbery victim, which is strange since after being shot twice in the back, he was still wearing a $2,000 gold necklace and watch. He still had his wallet, key and phone. Clearly, he was not a victim of robbery.
This has all the earmarks of a targeted hit job. However, strangely no one has been charged with this horrific crime, and what is more intriguing is that no law enforcement agency is even investigating this murder. According to other open sources, Metro police were told by their higher ups that if they spoke
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
His Name Was Seth Rich: His Father Confirms He’s Wikileaks’ Source
https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/969499352724070400?s=19
https://thegoldwater.com/news/19712-His-Name-Was-Seth-Rich-His-Father-Confirms-He-s-Wikileaks-Source
Seth Rich bump for later...
This is so clearly a political murder. We are under the thumb of criminals with Harvard degrees. Another reason to keep the 2nd Amendment safe for all.
Investigating the crime or suppressing evidence?
So, how can they "determine" that it was hacked by Russians??? Because a third party outfit told the alphabet agencies "told" them Russia did it???
I don't get why these situations always become so convoluted. Very simple. FBI inspects server, THEN determines if and who hacked it. AND, if not hacked, WHO downloaded the info???
I may have it wrong, but it seems like typical govt propaganda with ZERO evidence.
*
CrowdStrike has figured prominently in the Democratic National Committee cyber attacks and the attribution of those attacks to Russian intelligence services. On March 20, 2017 during testimony before congress, James Comey stated "CrowdStrike, Mandiant, and ThreatConnect review[ed] the evidence of the hack and conclude[d] with high certainty that it was the work of APT 28 and APT 29 who are known to be Russian intelligence services."[20] However, the FBI did not independently verify these findings because the DNC refused to give the FBI access to the server.[21]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CrowdStrike
There is an additional leap involved. Assume that some Russian originated virus was infecting DNC server.
That does not mean the "infector" got access to the DC e-mail; nor does it establish that this is the source of Wikileaks, even if some Russian hacker DID have the DNC emails.
The chain of reasoning is "Russian virus on DNC server, therefore Wikileaks got the DNC e-mails from Russia." The gap in evidence is clear.
Was an official autopsy ever done ?
Along with an urn containing Seth's cremated ashes.
Later
The DEEP STATE IS THE MEDIA.
No video footage from the area cams seems to be available either. Hmmm. You’d think the fix was in.
Mueller is either lying, pathetically gullible, or both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.