But the data is what it is.
If you have data from the time which contradicts the quotes in rockrr's post #61 above, please present it.
Otherwise, anyone reading this must assume you're just blowing smoke, right?
dsc: "Your purblind ferocity shows that it is useless to try and reason with you.
Once again I gave you the courtesy of a reply; I don’t propose to do so again."
"Prublind ferocity" would describe some posts from our pro-Confederates, by contrast with which the rest of us are gentle as lambs.
Plus, you actually made no reply at all, except to deny facts of history.
You claim your data has "already been presented", but you never presented anything, did you?
So now, having contributed exactly nothing to this discussion, you announce that you will continue to contribute... nothing.
Oh well...
“If you have data from the time which contradicts the quotes in rockrr’s post #61 above, please present it. Otherwise, anyone reading this must assume you’re just blowing smoke, right?”
One last try.
I doubt that your prejudice will allow you to evaluate the import of this history, but here’s a crumb.
https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Virginia_Slavery_Debate_of_1831-1832_The
Now, kindly take your purblind ferocity and honk off.