Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Silentgypsy
Yes, the argument was that you can disarm, the police will protect you.

The counter was that the police can not be everywhere.

The addendum now is that even if the police are there they will not do anything.

87 posted on 02/24/2018 10:57:12 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear
The ONLY persons that can be armed and be depended on to do the job of protecting the students are the actual parents of the students...(Some might make the argument that if they cared so much about their offspring, why did they commit them to a government propaganda asylum...)

Time and again the LEO's fail out of abject cowardice...Exceptions are rare.(Like the off-duty police officer hero in MD who, the other day, refused to give an attacker a clear view of the attacker's target and took a life-ending shotgun blast to the body at close range.)

NEA-type persons might be more interested in wondering just what the poor, down-trodden attacker had experienced to make him do such a thing...All the while hiding in a classroom closet while gunshots are loud and clear...

94 posted on 02/24/2018 11:26:06 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson