[Architect of Avalon]

Marriage should be a private contract that, like any contract, is binding in accordance with its terms upon its signers but which does not affect anyone who didn’t sign it.

[Romulus]

Marriage is not and cannot be private, because it has public consequences.

[i_robot73]

>
Marriage should be a private contract that, like any contract, is binding in accordance with its terms upon its signers but which does not affect anyone who didn’t sign it.
>

So, the vows are binding, as part of said contract (to death due us part)? How ‘bout infidelity?

Hell, I’d be happy if the MALE had *any* chance in divorce court (unlike today)...

[fwdude]

Marriage should be a private contract that, like any contract, is binding in accordance with its terms upon its signers but which does not affect anyone who didn’t sign it.

So, your employer doesn't have to offer your wife insurance coverage through your policy?