[SunkenCiv]

full title: "British-funded charity supported by Meghan Markle faces food for sex scandal after Haiti quake survivors were told by its workers they could either pay for aid... or sleep with them for it ".

[RegulatorCountry]

'It is astonishing people contracted to work on projects in Haiti could trade goods and cash for sex to some of the most vulnerable people on earth,' said Tory MP Nigel Evans.

No it isn't. Who is drawn to desperate people who will do anything for food? It's not just sincere, altruistic people who want to help. It's also perverse people who are very interested in the power to make others do anything for food and their interests are prurient.

[yldstrk]

can’t these assholes get any without threatening or buying it?

[beaversmom]

Very evil people on this planet. Not shocked, but it is disheartening.

[ronnie raygun]

There is an evil undercurrent running through these elite families and their friends, just ask bill and hillary

[beaversmom]

Aid work transforms an ordinary guy like me into a hedge fund titan or the owner of a Ferrari – it places in my pocket a ticket to the high life and a passport out of hell. Therein lay the path to my moral undoing.

Reading and watching a lot about the Nazis and their associates in WWII. The depths that normally powerless people will sink for said power and riches is very much on my mind.

[Beautiful_Gracious_Skies]

Glad they got busted. It’s a negative reflection on the loud mouth Markle.

Prince Harry has made a terrible choice in his selection of a bride.

[bray]

Ain’t Marxism wonderful.

[proud American in Canada]

the Royal family really doesn’t like Markle.

[Tax-chick]

I didn’t get the memo, but if I understand correctly, the official line is: Men working for World Vision forced starving women and children to trade sex for food, and it’s all Meghan Markle’s fault.

Is that right?