To: SuperLuminal
Not too sure that it would...What reasons would there be? The Supreme Court ruled in the Heller decision, and reaffirmed it in the McDonald v. Chicago decision, that reasonable fire arms restrictions are permissible and within the state's authority to enact.
To: DoodleDawg
They must be reasonable.
That rules out an outbright ban on guns or a may issue gun control regime.
A gun control law must have a valid relationship to securing public safety.
NY’s gun control law doesn’t pass that test.
68 posted on
02/13/2018 1:35:59 PM PST by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
To: DoodleDawg
"The Supreme Court ruled in the Heller decision, and reaffirmed it in the McDonald v. Chicago decision, that reasonable fire arms restrictions are permissible and within the state's authority to enact" Good point...Everything gets a little foggy at 84...{:-)
69 posted on
02/13/2018 1:44:12 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson