Posted on 02/09/2018 4:11:56 PM PST by mojito
...On Wednesday the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee released a majority staff report titled The Clinton Email Scandal And The FBIs Investigation Of It. The committee also released thousands of text messages between two agents and lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page that shed light on the criminal intent of deep state players to avoid prosecution of Hillary Clinton and to block and destroy a Trump presidency.
Now this
Peter Strzok and the FBI knew Hillary Clinton used Bleachbit to delete her emails on March 29, 2016. This was the same week they were deleted.
Strzok and the FBI said nothing about this. They knew about this crime at the time and did nothing. Trey Gowdy announced this news in August 2016 months later.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
thousands of text messages between two agents and lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page
Are there any texts which actually substantiate such an alleged relationship?
A pretense for withholding texts that are deemed personal. Another obstruction of justice.
No statute of limitation on murder. The clock on the statute for child exploitation starts ticking when the child has legal capacity and remembers the exploitation. Effectively, no statute of limitations for child exploitation, either.
Also, no statute of limitations for federal violation of civil rights. That’s what DOJ used to give Alabama white-on-black racial killers double jeopardy. Reasonable sure President Donald J. Trump, Sr. can go to the DA with that, and that multiple states are involved. Considering the scope of spying and unmasking, I think a civil class action is also in order.
Also it might be 50 shades of yuck, can't be read on the radio, etc. I think that would be a distraction from the other serious criminality.
Yea maybe - but I have a problem with the concept of ‘privacy’ on a business phone.
It is pretty clear Page and Strzok also used personal iPhones for some of their comms which could be relevant. There's obviously a higher bar to obtain that evidence since I believe it has not been demanded and handed over to Congress.
There doesn't really have to be a Statute of Limitations, they only have to say there is or is not according to their whim.
Or they could just say that no jury would convict as Sessions did with Lois Lerner or Bob Menendez.
The ‘lovers’ concept was floated by the FBI to explain the enormously HIGH volume of emails.
Lock
Her
Up
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.