Skip to comments.
E-mail connects Warner, McCabe via NameRedacted (Twitter)
Twitter ^
| 2/9/2018
| @nameredacted5
Posted on 02/09/2018 6:21:24 AM PST by LS
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Road Warrior ‘04
My immediate guess as well.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
You’re telling me.
That means Warner (code name “Oligarch”) and Shifty were getting the intel and sharing it back with the Deep State coupsters.
22
posted on
02/09/2018 6:45:34 AM PST
by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I found it disturbing that Nunes had to recuse himself while being investigated for not sharing info with the committee.
Warner, did the same, no reprecussion. Rubio today stated, no biggie, Warner told the committee 4 months ago about this. But he didn’t tell until it was discovered via IG so he was forced to tell.
23
posted on
02/09/2018 6:45:44 AM PST
by
Engedi
To: LS
He doesn’t want them leaking that they have nothing
24
posted on
02/09/2018 6:46:51 AM PST
by
PMAS
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
To: LS
IIRC, back during Gulf War-1 Rush had a spoof commercial for a movie of the same with actors with physical traits similar to the politicians of the day.
It was a funny bit and would like to see one done for this current mess.
The best comparison I remember was Dick Gephardt payed by E.T.
25
posted on
02/09/2018 6:50:08 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
( Hillary, DNC, DOJ and FBI colluded with a British National to influence the 2016 Pres. election)
To: LS
I hope the IG is keeping a second set of books. Something tells me the moment he announces he’s completed his investigation the FBI is going to pay him a visit and confiscate all materials and pass out the threatening non-disclosure letters.
I would be surprised if the completed report sees the light of day.
26
posted on
02/09/2018 6:52:30 AM PST
by
Fhios
(1988 - Where's Waldo :: 2018 - Where's Jeff Sessions.)
To: Basket_of_Deplorables
No big deal — Except when someone uses bleach-bit to destroy subpoenaed, incriminating emails. At that point, it becomes a very big deal.
27
posted on
02/09/2018 6:52:32 AM PST
by
Bob
(Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
To: Basket_of_Deplorables
No big deal — Except when someone uses bleach-bit to destroy subpoenaed, incriminating emails. At that point, it becomes a very big deal.
28
posted on
02/09/2018 6:52:53 AM PST
by
Bob
(Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
To: LS
Lil’ Marco Rubio is somehow defending Warner on this odoriferous activity.
29
posted on
02/09/2018 6:55:48 AM PST
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: LS
30
posted on
02/09/2018 6:56:09 AM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: LS
31
posted on
02/09/2018 6:56:56 AM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: LS
McCabe. The no. 2 at @FBI
He was #1 after Comey was fired. Remember that?
To: WildHighlander57
I’ll bet on that for a dollar!
33
posted on
02/09/2018 7:06:08 AM PST
by
gr8eman
(Facts and evidence are bourgeois constructs weaponized by patriarchal penis-people)
To: LouisianaJoanof Arc; LS
You’re absolutely right. Thanks to LS, too. Very significant post.
34
posted on
02/09/2018 7:13:22 AM PST
by
mairdie
To: Bob
35
posted on
02/09/2018 7:14:31 AM PST
by
HollyB
To: LS
Notice that Mulehead has all these culprits sequestered, corralled, and unable to go on talk shows, do articles, or otherwise defend themselves.hmmmm.
Given the Clinton M.O. (after news of Monica came out, it is reported that Bill Clinton said, "Well, we'll just have to win, then"), and Lanny Davis et al. declaring "it's just about sex!" and smearing Ken Starr...you're right.
36
posted on
02/09/2018 7:21:01 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: LS
Sessions likely figured that there were leaks in his side that they hadn't identified yet (remember, this was one of Flynn's jobs and an early push was to purge all the leakers). Perhaps the reason for the directive to abstain from talking to congress without permission?
37
posted on
02/09/2018 7:21:04 AM PST
by
glock rocks
(... so much win!)
To: LS
I’m sure there is an innocent explanation for this . . . just waiting on CNN to tell me what it is.
To: LS
No. Name is a former LEO.Thank you! Regardless, McNuts' fingerprints are all over this!
To: hsmomx3
And Rubio is out there defending Warner all over the place saying the committee knew of this four months ago. The exchange of emails started in February. Why did the committee only find out about it four months ago and how did that come about? And we the public only found out about it this week. Why?
40
posted on
02/09/2018 7:38:21 AM PST
by
kabar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson