Posted on 02/07/2018 2:26:16 PM PST by detective
There is a deluge of information now coming out of months-long parallel investigations by the House (Nunes and Goodlatte), and Senate (Grassley and Johnson), along with DOJ Inspector General Horowitz. It can be easy to get lost amid the deluge.
Representative Jim Jordan gives a solid summary of how the information intersects amid the “small group” within a corrupt upper-tier of FBI officials.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
The timeline is very interesting.
From the comments:
I saw this elsewhere on the internets. It could be called the libs’ defense of the Obama FBI:
Complete and systemic incompetence. We didn’t know it was a politically motivated dossier. We didn’t know that our agents and attorneys were politically motivated. We didn’t know that the source was a foreign national with an ax to grind against the opposition candidate. We didn’t know that we were supposed to mention any of these things on the warrant. We didn’t know that he had been instructed by the Democrat National Committee to disseminate this information to the MSM. We were completely unaware that the data from the dossier and the reports in the MSM were from the same source because we didn’t fact check any of it. We didn’t know that it was wrong to use the Foreign Surveillance laws to spy on domestic targets. We didn’t know that our own agent was supposedly a Russian conduit when he worked for us and only became concerned when he went to work for the opposition candidate. When we discovered these facts we didn’t know that we should have gone back to the judge and explain our failures to properly vet the dossier. We didn’t know that our agents texts and emails, especially during an important investigation should have been archived. We didn’t know that our agents and attorneys were %&^%*% each other. We didn’t know that they were making jokes and references about the incoming President- their new boss- that sounded like they were planning sedition. We didn’t know that they were spending so much time- however much times it takes to write and send 50,000 texts- on government equipment during office hours to keep up with their lovers instead of doing their jobs. We didn’t know that the wife of the guy in charge of this investigation was receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars from Hillary’s bag man. We didn’t know that the Justice Department Official who had dealings with this case was married to a woman who worked for the company that paid 10 million for the dossier.
Do I need to go on? If this wasn’t deliberate then they ought to all be canned right now for malfeasance and incompetence. What’s the point of an investigative agency that doesn’t investigate?
Read this. It doesn’t format easily, but the link is good.
https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2018/02/07/who-whom-when/
If they want to go on the incompetence track, I’m guessing that every crook who has been found guilty via FIB evidence over the last 20 years will demand a new trial - and probably get it.
***
“If they want to go on the incompetence track, I’m guessing that every crook who has been found guilty via FIB evidence over the last 20 years will demand a new trial - and probably get it.”
Every FBI criminal charge from Mueller’s reign to Comey’s reign as FBI Directors will be at risk.
As walls close in on FBI, the bureau lashes out at its antagonists!
BY SHARYL ATTKISSON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 01/25/18 01:50 PM EST 2,502
What happens when federal agencies accused of possible wrongdoing also control the alleged evidence against them? What happens when they’re the ones in charge of who inside their agencies — or connected to them — ultimately gets investigated and possibly charged?
Those questions are moving to the forefront as the facts play out in the investigations into our intelligence agencies’ surveillance activities.
There are two overarching issues.
First, there’s the alleged improper use of politically funded opposition research to justify secret warrants to spy on U.S. citizens for political purposes.
Second, if corruption is ultimately identified at high levels in our intel agencies, it would necessitate a re-examination of every case and issue the officials touched over the past decade — or two — under administrations of both parties.
This is why I think the concerns transcend typical party politics.
It touches everybody. It’s potentially monumental.
Excerpted, for full oped go to the link below:
“Crew”? Sort of like a mafia street crew?
“Crew”? Sort of like a mafia street crew?
One certainly has to wonder if we have enough Supermax prison cells to hold all of those who certainly deserve to be incarcerated therein?
Too bad they can’t bring some back to life....
A combination of prison, hanging and exile should do it. After fair trial, of course.
Works for me!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.