Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“We are all MAGAs now."
1 posted on 02/05/2018 6:58:34 AM PST by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mandaladon
"bend an entire party to his will"

Translation from LeftSpeak: "bend an entire party a party elite to his will the will of its rank and file".

2 posted on 02/05/2018 7:05:10 AM PST by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
"...and has helped make the law-and-order party skeptical of FBI leadership."

LOL. This from the party which cheers for groups that murder police officers.

3 posted on 02/05/2018 7:05:28 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/05/the_obama_cult.html

Liberals like to plagiarize don’t they?


4 posted on 02/05/2018 7:06:58 AM PST by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

No, what has happened is a hostile takeover of GOP by its rank-and-file.


5 posted on 02/05/2018 7:09:54 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
"dependent on Social Security, Medicaid"

Both programs that were implemented by Democrats and we would have ultimately been better off without them. However, why is it not conservative to give people SSN and medicare (I'm thinking he meant medicare and not medicaid) when they spent their whole adult lives contributing to both programs and are now just reaping the benefits of what they contributed to?

Conservatives have always been against giving people things, not paying them back what they paid into. Yes, we would have all been better off without both programs but you can't fault people for wanting back the money that they put into a government program. A little different than welfare.
6 posted on 02/05/2018 7:10:41 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

I reject that argument entirely. If there was no Obama there would be no candidate Trump. If there was no Hillary there wouldn’t be a President Trump.

The country was desperate for Trump because of those two.


7 posted on 02/05/2018 7:13:58 AM PST by Fhios (1987 - Where's Waldo. 2017 - Where's Jeff Sessions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Many of us regarded the neocon dogmas and Bohemian Grove rot with aversion and even hatred - and did so from the very beginning. It has taken this long to have a champion again, after the black day of January 20, 1989.

Trump did not change the base. He stripped the degenerate veneer off of the grifter elite.


8 posted on 02/05/2018 7:15:30 AM PST by Psalm 144 (Ace McCain: The tumor is a rumor but the boot was a hoot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
The source close to GOP leadership said

Gee, another reliable anonymous source ... if they even really exist


10 posted on 02/05/2018 7:22:07 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

The party leadership as it was composed, part of what we all called the Uniparty, was the aberration, not Trump’s populism.


11 posted on 02/05/2018 7:33:03 AM PST by BlackAdderess (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Axios is a dem, lib, funded fake news website that is no better than CNN. It just sounds like a teen age boy deodorant.


12 posted on 02/05/2018 7:33:17 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Do not go gentle into that good night. Dylan Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
13 posted on 02/05/2018 7:34:28 AM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

As always, the case in this article is overstated. Republicans have been for big spending since George Bush. Bush even tried to implement tariffs early in his presidency. The base has always been for enforcing immigration laws even if the Republican establishment has been against it. That is why we had the rebellions at the end of Bush’s presidency. The irony is that Trump is not an ideological person. He doesn’t have a well-thought out theory of government like Reagan did. For the most part, Trump will go along with whatever Republicanism currently is. He isn’t shaping it at all. But he is giving voice to the suppressed parts of the base on trade and immigration. Those voices were always there, however.


14 posted on 02/05/2018 7:34:52 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

“All evidence in the last two years points to the fact that the R base was never as ‘conservative’ on economic policy as we portrayed them during the Obama years.”

Wasn’t it Obama who was going to get us into the Trans-Pacific Partnership? And isn’t it called something like “trade liberalization”? The point is globalism and global government.


15 posted on 02/05/2018 7:35:22 AM PST by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
R base was never as 'conservative' on economic policy

Crony Capitalism has never been a Conservative value. The Bush family, starting in 1988, corrupted the GOP elite with their love of Crony Capitalism in the guide of "globalism". Trump is a return to a traditional GOP outlook on Globalism.

17 posted on 02/05/2018 8:00:21 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("The political class is a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself" Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Trump nationalized anti- illegal immigration period.
The beauty of it went right to the core of red v blue.
Want to stop ms-13 AND punish blue states for Bobo?
Vote Trump.

Hell it’ll work again in 2020.


18 posted on 02/05/2018 8:09:01 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Vive la revolution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Axios...another plot to inform us of where Red Herring swim.


19 posted on 02/05/2018 8:10:48 AM PST by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Where the heck was this guy the 8 years before Trump became President?

Talk about a cult of personality...


20 posted on 02/05/2018 8:12:56 AM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Given how sceptical most of Trump’s supporters are it’s highly unlikely they would be cult like followers.

As for free trade support we always been , although Donald Trump’s argument is for fair trade. Positing that existing trade deals are not fair to Americans. That is what we are buying tenistively.

As for shifting the party on other issues this happens all the time. The shift isn’t as big of a shift as you think thou.

For example while we may be conserned about deffiecent we also know the power of good economic policy and the central importance of infistructure to an economy. We know Donald Trump’s life time in reeatate construction staying ahead of schedule and under budget makes him the perfect man to garrrentee we get the best bang for our buck In all of these regards.


23 posted on 02/05/2018 5:35:03 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson