Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I wonder how many will actually adopt it, and then watch businesses and residents flee these States.
1 posted on 02/04/2018 11:17:15 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1

And the exodus begins in 5,4,3,2,1....

Worst part, when they leave for points South or West, they bring all the liberal crap with them for at least a generation, if not longer.


2 posted on 02/04/2018 11:23:40 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Hmmm all blue states on the election map usually.


3 posted on 02/04/2018 11:25:09 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Soon as I retire, I’m outta California.


4 posted on 02/04/2018 11:29:09 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

when challenged, the lower courts will likely find it to be unconstitutional and SCOTUS will refuse to hear it again.


5 posted on 02/04/2018 11:31:42 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Just one more reason not to live in these states.


6 posted on 02/04/2018 11:32:00 AM PST by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Democrats doubling-down on suicide.


7 posted on 02/04/2018 11:34:50 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=400>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Why stop there?

With floods, fires, and earthquakes, require them to buy homeowner ir renters insurance for their personal items.


9 posted on 02/04/2018 11:36:38 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Ask a lib if Alger Hiss colluded with the Russians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Maryland, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, the District of Columbia ... I wonder what these states have in common?

There must be something really important to want to oppress and remove freedom of choice from their residents or are they thinking of the future when they can demand the purchase of something else or forbid the use of the other thing?


10 posted on 02/04/2018 11:39:30 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Maryland, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and District of Columbia.
Wacko leftist centers of democrat insanity.


11 posted on 02/04/2018 11:45:50 AM PST by I want the USA back (Patriarchal binary all original-equipment breeder and White-privileged crusader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
"Lawmakers in Maryland are considering a law requiring residents to buy health insurance. California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington, as well as the District of Columbia, are also considering similar proposals..."

Hmmm...Reads like a list of the former Soviet Union's socialist republics...USSR...

13 posted on 02/04/2018 11:54:59 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1; All
"Lawmakers in Maryland are considering a law requiring residents to buy health insurance. California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington, as well as the District of Columbia, are also considering similar proposals, according to the Journal report."

The citizens of all the states first need to work with their state lawmakers in supporting Pres. Trump to lead the states to put a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes by repealing the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments (16 & 17A).

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States."—Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.


Once unconstitutional federal taxes are stopped, the states and their citizens will likely experience a tsunami of new revenues and higher incomes that they probably won’t know what to do with.

In fact, consider that the congressional records shows that Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker, had clarified the following about the fed’s constitutionally limited powers.

”... the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Federal Constitution, is in the States, and not in the Federal Government [emphases added].” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1866. (See about middle of 3rd column.)


Also consider that a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices had reflected on Bingham’s words with the following clarification of Congress’s very limited domestic policy powers.

"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

Citizens and their respective state lawmakers will be able to consider new options regarding healthcare after unconstitutional federal interference in state affairs is stopped, a given state’s healthcare policy ultimately depending on what the legal majority voters of a given state want.

And to make sure that state social spending programs and Pres. Trump’s vision for MAGA last as long as possible, we really need to repeal 16 & 17A.

In the meanwhile, patriots now need to finish the job that they started by electing Trump president in 2016.

Patriots need to do this by now making sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting, state sovereignty-respecting patriot candidates on the 2018 primary ballots, and pink-slip incumbents by seeing patriot candidate lawmakers to DC on election day.

But until the states wake up and repeal the 17A, as evidenced by concerns about the integrity of Alabama's special Senate election, patriot candidates need to win elections by a large enough margin to compensate for possible deep state ballot box fraud and associated MSM scare tactics.

Hacking Democracy - The Hack

15 posted on 02/04/2018 12:02:45 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

High tax blue-states.


16 posted on 02/04/2018 12:03:19 PM PST by CodeToad (CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Yay even more liberals fleeing to Virginia!


17 posted on 02/04/2018 12:05:23 PM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

This should be interesting. Because of the Roberts opinion, such an individual mandate could be challenged unless it was done as a tax. And if it was done as a tax, because of the new SALT rule, which means their citizens would not be able to deduct a dime of that money from their federal income taxes.

Putting this in real dollar terms, say someone pays $100,000 in annual income taxes, and $30,000 in state taxes, that before would reduce their federal taxes to $70,000, but because of the end of the SALT rule, their taxes are now up to $130,000.

ADD TO THAT the state mandate tax for health insurance, again *not* federally deductible. In New York, for a family of four, this could be $20,000 a year (or more.)

So, in just two years, their total taxes go from $100,000 to $150,000.

Ouch.


19 posted on 02/04/2018 12:20:19 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Blue states self-gerrymandering themselves out of Electoral College votes as those who can flee, do flee.

I hope the ultra-liberal portions flee to the deep red states where there is conservative surplus either to absorb them or convert them.


22 posted on 02/04/2018 1:55:02 PM PST by Oscar in Batangas (12:01 PM 1/20/2017...The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Mandate liberals buy my own Global Warming insurance.

Only $50 per month.


24 posted on 02/04/2018 2:33:52 PM PST by TheNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
The ACA's individual mandate was implemented as a way to keep premiums low by requiring everyone to have insurance. Proponents of the mandate say that, without it, healthy people are less inclined to buy insurance, causing premiums to rise for those who need it the most.

Frigging morons all...

IF IT IS NOT RISK-BASED, IT IN NOT %$#d^&%)*&!! INSURANCE!!
JUST A MONUMENTALLY MASSIVE WELFARE PROGRAM BY ANOTHER NAME...

26 posted on 02/04/2018 4:18:02 PM PST by publius911 (Am I pissed? You have NO idea...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Guess what 9 states you can’t find a u-haul in.


27 posted on 02/04/2018 5:03:04 PM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson