Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Making Sense of Scripture’s ‘Inconsistency’ [Homosexuality vs Dietary Laws]
The Gospel Coalition ^ | 7/9/12 | Tim Keller

Posted on 02/03/2018 4:03:21 PM PST by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Just a note of warning/heads up: The Gospel Coalition is a site that ought to be used with increasing caution.

The organization, though started by good men, seems to have become increasingly enamored with the social liberalism.

There are still good elements, but use discernment.

This article is one of the good ones...note, however, it is a few years old.

1 posted on 02/03/2018 4:03:21 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“This article is one of the good ones”

Tim Keller, the author of the article, is indeed one of the good ones. He has very good Bible studies if you want to look them up.


2 posted on 02/03/2018 4:07:13 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I am amazed at how many Christians apparently never read the book of Acts.

Then pleased it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas; namely, Judas surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren:
And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren send greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia: Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment: It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who shall also tell you the same things by mouth.
For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things; That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.

Acts 15:22-29

These are the basic moral laws that Christian Gentiles are to follow.

You might notice that sexual laws are mentioned while other laws are not.

It is written out very clearly and yet, for some reason you would think it was an obscure and convoluted bit of scripture.

3 posted on 02/03/2018 4:17:14 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
I am amazed at how many Christians apparently never read the book of Acts.

This is kind of a "Christianity 101" that isn't taught real often in churches. It should be. A whole lot of non-Christians love to use these supposed "inconsistencies" to bash the Bible and Christians. They plainly have no idea what they're talking about, but too many Christians aren't equipped with proper Biblical knowledge to confront the lies.

4 posted on 02/03/2018 4:20:30 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Making Sense of Scripture’s ‘Inconsistency’ [Homosexuality vs Dietary Laws]

My heavens, that's the most irresistible Free Republic title ever.

5 posted on 02/03/2018 4:21:15 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat; SoFloFreeper
Author forgets the stoning of the woman caught in adultery, when the Jews were under the Old Testament and under Roman rule...

LOL.

I learned a lot from messianic Jews. This article has some good points, but saying the penalty for adultery was a civil and not religious remedy under the Old Testament is bunk.

Jesus lived under the Old Testament, as did the last OT prophet, John the Baptist.

The New Covenant or New Testament didn't begin until after the Cross, when the Holy Spirit was poured out on all mankind at Pentecost.

And that's why Mary was in the upper room when the Holy Spirit fell, along with the other disciples.

But to say that adultery and other sins were civil punishments is bunk...

Again, the Jews stoned Stephen, and tried to stone the woman caught in adultery , tried to stone Jesus, etc...

Weird article that needs absolute correction by actual Christians...

6 posted on 02/03/2018 4:24:53 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

It helps to know when He is speaking to the Jew and when He is addressing the church - it’s called ‘rightly dividing the word of truth’


7 posted on 02/03/2018 4:26:48 PM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
If you look at the OT section that (for example) prohibits the eating of shellfish, you will find the statement that such foods shall be "unto you" an abomination. And the "you" unto whom the abomination it was does not include us goyim.

The laws about depraved sex acts all just say, "It is an abomination", as in, an objective, universal fact.

8 posted on 02/03/2018 4:28:31 PM PST by thulldud ("What makes it news is its dissemination, not its concrete reality." -- Ellul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

Well, Peter and Paul clarified that gentiles (they would not have called us goyim, that is a Talmudic curse on gentiles, btw) were not under dietary and other non essential laws, but were to adhere to laws about sexuality.


9 posted on 02/03/2018 4:37:55 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Exactly. The insistence that the Torah has been "fulfilled" or superseded is where all the trouble started.

Chrstians have brought this on themselves.

10 posted on 02/03/2018 4:41:20 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vegam Yehudah tillachem biYrushalayim . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
It is not even something that people can say, "well it was just what Paul taught."

If you read the whole chapter you find that all of the apostles and elders were united in this teaching.

But if you read this article you will not find one mention of Acts 15 in it.

And if you read another dozen articles about this issue it is doubtful even one will mention it.

It is like the book does not exist.

Is it because it is too clear?

11 posted on 02/03/2018 4:44:12 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

“Then I heard a voice telling me, ‘Get up, Peter. Kill and eat. I replied, ‘Surely not, Lord! Nothing impure or unclean has ever entered my mouth. “The voice spoke from heaven a second time, ‘Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”

Acts, 11:7-9

God, Himself set aside the dietary laws


12 posted on 02/03/2018 4:45:44 PM PST by Fai Mao (I still want to see The PIAPS in prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“Your Word is Truth, and every one of your righteous statutes is everlasting.” Psalm 119:160.
“Think not that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you that until Heaven and earth pass away not one jot or one tittle shall pass from the Law till all is fulfilled.” Matthew 5:17-18.
The Torah, all of it, is still in effect, and must be observed, especially by those who claim to be the Talmidim (disciples) of Yeshua (Jesus). John tells us in his revered letter “He who says that he abides in Him ought himself to walk even as He walked.” 1 John 2:6
How did Yeshua walk? He walked in perfect, yes Perfect Observance of all of the Torah; every jot and tittle. See his statement above in Matthew.
The Torah is A living fire! It is Life! And it is Eternal. Now go and learn what this means!


13 posted on 02/03/2018 4:46:10 PM PST by Torahman (Remember the Maccabees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

Of course.

But Peter had to relate the story for posterity... and Paul confirmed.


14 posted on 02/03/2018 4:57:31 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

This is just plain wrong. This vision came to Peter 14 years after Pentecost!
What took him so long? Didn’t he actually walk and live with Yeshua? He says “Nothing unclean has ever entered my mouth.” Peter was stunned and perplexed. But as he was trying to figure it out men came to invite him to the house of Cornelius. Peter goes there and teaches them Yeshua, and as he does the Ruach HaKodesh falls on them “as it did on us” (the Jews). And suddenly Peter and his astonished friends realize that “G-d is no respecter of persons, but every nation that works righteousness (i.e. Keeps Torah) is accepted by Him.” The vision was not about food! G-d was using the unimaginable idea of eating unclean food to break the ancient Jewish exclusion of Gentiles from the Covenant. The commandments are forever. Get used to it. Not one of them is going away.


15 posted on 02/03/2018 5:00:47 PM PST by Torahman (Remember the Maccabees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged
Well, Peter and Paul clarified that gentiles (they would not have called us goyim, that is a Talmudic curse on gentiles, btw) were not under dietary and other non essential laws, but were to adhere to laws about sexuality.

They would have referred to the conclusions of the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15, which they both attended.

I was just pointing out that the restricted application of the dietary laws was in view from the outset, as was the universal sanction against porneia.

And "goyim" is the normal Hebrew word for "nations" in the Tanakh. It's not necessarily a curse. The word Peter and Paul used on the written record was ethne, which is Greek. (What they used at home I can't say, since I never learned Aramaic.)

16 posted on 02/03/2018 5:02:05 PM PST by thulldud ("What makes it news is its dissemination, not its concrete reality." -- Ellul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

The authority of Peter and Paul’s writings as the actual Word of God is what I was referring to...

That’s neat you know the languages, and it is interesting that the strange rituals of the Talmudic mindset altered all of these terms, because gentiles who believed in Christ were now grafted into the vine.

And the Holy Spirit which once was behind the Veil in the Temple, was now poured out on all His “maidservants and menservants” as per the prophet Joel, at Pentecost.


17 posted on 02/03/2018 5:14:40 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

Good comments but consider this: There is no such thing as “The Old Testament”. Who died? G-d? The used of the term is for one’s Last Will and Testament. The use of that term connotes that the Torah is old, dusty, and belongs in a museum. This is deceptive and untrue. As for the term “New Testament” the same holds true. There is a “New Covenant” not a new testament. And this New Covenant is defined by the Bible in Jeremiah 31:31: “And this is the new covenant that I shall make with the House of Israel. In those days I will write the words of my Torah upon their hearts. And they will all know me”. You should really study and walk out the Torah, and you too can partake of the only New Covenant that can be found in the Bible.


18 posted on 02/03/2018 5:15:01 PM PST by Torahman (Remember the Maccabees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

great expository


19 posted on 02/03/2018 5:25:29 PM PST by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The Shellfish/Mixed Fiber Gambit reminds me of a quip of Solomon’s:

“Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him;
Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes.”

Proverbs 26


20 posted on 02/03/2018 5:26:00 PM PST by avenir ("But as for you, teach what accords with sound doctrine."--Paul to Titus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson