Posted on 02/02/2018 11:05:12 AM PST by tschatski
The Washington Examiner’s Byron York concludes his article summarizing the memo’s key FISA abuses by warning a new showdown between Republicans and Democrats could resurface when additional information is released. Translation: the FISA memo could be the first of many memos exposing corruption at both the FBI and Justice Department.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Frankly, we have enough evidence to pursue a prosecution against those who signed off on the FISA warrants. If we don’t see that then why do we need more, we need action.
I’d like to know what the FBI wanted redacted. Seems like a pretty vanilla memo to me. Players already known, etc.
I am loving this. Maybe, just MAYBE we can get to the bottom of this pile and find the academic records of Barry Sotelho from Indonesia, the guy who never said he was a U.S. citizen to qualify for a Rhodes scholarship.
We need arrests, seriesly.
More info, more popcorn, more winning.
Im interested to know how the monitoring extended beyond Page to the other players on the campaign/Trump admin .....ie Flynn. This FISA warrant or others?
Maybe they were just grasping at straws.
P to the shame of the nation
York is very credible. So is John Solomon ( at the hill) and Sarah Carter now. They are all journalistic heroes well beyond the shoddy and uncorroborated “deep Throat” manufactured by a disgruntled bastard turned down by Nixon to be FIB director.That was Woodward and Bernstein’s fake news. How that pales to childs play compared to this treason and sedition.
The agents are just the tip of the iceberg. We need an independent investigation and a grand jury.
The RNC could probably run a Yorkshire Terrier against ANY Dem and win.
When does the Democrat memo get released?
Anybody seen our Sleepy AG today?
__________
NO SH*T
.... thanks for the ping, bitt.
How about the unmasking that happened up in the brown bomber’s administration?
I remember McCain’s pal David Kramer was subpoenaed by Nunes late Decmber.
Has he been interviewed yet?
“Frankly, we have enough evidence to pursue a prosecution against those who signed off on the FISA warrants. If we don’t see that then why do we need more, we need action.”
YES, but what I’d like explained is what actions the FISA Court could take given what they now know? Can they, will they, sanction people who perpetrated this fraud on the court?
Hey, where’s that pic of Captain Obvious?
...well, it is Ground Hog Day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.