No honor among liars and thieves. Their future closed door meetings will likely resemble this. Some will head for the tall grass and others will squeal, in hopes of getting the deal.
Posted on 02/02/2018 9:25:29 AM PST by dragnet2
The House Intelligence Committee has released the, "Memo".
How does one get the secret court to reverse its spying warrants, to get Rosensten to cancel the investigation, for Mueller to close it down? It is all poisoned as a Clinton and FBI-funded political witch hunt.
Yes, but how addressed? Seems start is to fire Rosenstien and all others involved, second is order Mueller to shut down investigation, third is to ask the FISA court to reverse its warrants. But that would require Sessions and Trump to act. They haven't so I presume there is more political mileage letting this continue than by closing it down and maybe even prosecuting the culprits?
Comey wraps it up about right. All this is out, nothing new, and nothing happening. Sad.
For those who are link challenged or would rather not use links for whatever reasons.
_________________________________
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
February 2, 2018
The Honorable Devin Nunes
Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Mr. Chairman:
On January 29, 2018, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (herein after “the Committee”) voted to disclose publicly a memorandum containing classified information provided to the Committee in connection with its oversight activities (the “Memorandum,”which is attached to this letter). As provided by clause 11(g) of Rule of the House of Representatives, the Committee has forwarded this Memorandum to the President based on its determination that the release of the Memorandum would serve the public interest.
The Constitution vests the President with the authority to protect national security secrets from disclosure. As the Supreme Court has recognized, it is the President’s responsibility to classify, declassify, and control access to information bearing on our intelligence sources and methods and national defense. See, Dep of Navy v. Egan, 484 US. 518, 527 (1988). In order to facilitate appropriate congressional oversight, the Executive Branch may entrust classified information to the appropriate committees of Congress, as it has done in connection with the Committee’s oversight activities here. The Executive Branch does so on the assumption that the Committee will responsibly protect such classified information, consistent with the laws of the United States.
The Committee has now determined that the release of the Memorandum would be appropriate. The Executive Branch, across Administrations of both parties, has worked to accommodate congressional requests to declassify specific materials in the public interest. However, public release of classified information by unilateral action of the Legislative Branch is extremely rare and raises significant separation of powers concerns. Accordingly, the Committee’s request to release the Memorandum is interpreted as a request for declassification pursuant to the President’s authority. The President understands that the protection of our national security represents his highest obligation. Accordingly, he has directed lawyers and national security staff to assess the declassification request, consistent with established standards governing the handling of classified information, including those under Section 3.1(d) of Executive Order 13526. Those standards permit declassification when the public interest in disclosure outweighs any need to protect the information. The White House review process also included input from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Justice. Consistent with this review and these standards, the President has determined that declassification of the Memorandum is appropriate.
Based on this assessment and in light of the significant public interest in the memorandum, the President has authorized the declassification of the Memorandum. To be clear, theMemorandum rejects the judgments of its congressional authors. The President understands that oversight concerning matters related to the Memorandum may be continuing. Though the circumstances leading to the declassification through this process are extraordinary, the Executive Branch stands ready to work with Congress to accommodate oversight requests consistent with applicable standards and processes, including the need to protect intelligence sources and methods.
Declassified by order of the President
February 2, 2018
January 18, 2018
To: HPSCI Majority Members
From: HPSCI Majority Staff
Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses at the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Purpose
This memorandum provides Members an update on significant facts relating to theCommittee’s ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (F ISA) during the2016 presidential election cycle. Our findings, which are detailed below, 1) raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the Foreign IntelligenceSurveillance Court (FISC), and 2) represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the ISA process.
Investigation Update-
On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a ISA probable cause order(up; under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is aUS citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent .with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy AttorneyGeneral (DAG), or the Senate confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division. The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the ISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications. in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.
Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the ISC are classified. As such, the public’s confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court’s ability to hold the government to the highest standard,particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens. However, the rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the government’s production to the court of all material and relevant facts. This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts. However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.
1. The “dossier” compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.
a. Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or. any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials
b. The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named US. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a US. law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOI at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of — and paid by — the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.
2. The Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23, 2016, YahooNews article by- Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page’s July 2016 trip to Moscow.- This article does not corroborate the Steele dossier because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News. The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News. Steele has admitted in British court filings that he met with Yahoo News — and several other outlets — in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS. Perkins Coie was aware of Steele’s initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington DC in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.
a. Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations — an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI in an October 30, 2016, Mother Jones article by David Corn Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other outlets in September — before the Page application was submitted to the FISC in October — but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts
b. Steele’s numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling — maintaining confidentiality — and demonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI.
3. Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce 0hr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not, being president.” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files — but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.
a. During this same time period, Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISC.
4. According to the head of the counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its “infancy” at the time of the initialPage FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele’s reporting as only minimally corroborated. Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was — according to his June 2017 testimony — “salacious and unverified.” While the FISA application relied on Steele’s past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations. Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.
5. The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok. Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel’s Office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI Attorney Lisa Page (no known relation to Carter Page), where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, Whom Strzok had also investigated. The Strzok/Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an “insurance” policy against President Trumps election.
So says the scuzzball.
And that his wife was inside fusion gps working on collecting the info.
What is your problem?! Getting real tired of you trashing people with insults here on FR.
It’s all wrapped up and nothing happened? If he only had one wish, that would be it. And if ya buy that load from Comey, you’ll buy anything.
Did you know how many FISA warrants Comey signed? Or the number of warrants his cronies signed? You admit that "we see Rosenstein on down are involved", which leads me to believe you didn't know that either until the memo was released. So what the hell are you complaining about? Had you prior verification that the FBI and DOJ relied not only on the dossier, but on a Michael Isikoff article which was based solely on the dossier in their submissions to the FISA Court? Did you know that the FBI/DOJ failed to inform the Court that Steele was on the payroll of the DNC, or that he met, and shared dossier info with the press? This is only one memo that's going to be released. We are still waiting for the IG's report. Jesus...stop grumbling.
Sounds like we're on the same page. Plus the DNC is six million in debt and just losing everywhere. Behind the scenes must be chaos. Smart ones would leave the field, get help, tell the truth and get out of the swamp but from what I have observed with these leftists they will hold out like Diem Ben Phu except the difference is the French were heroes fighting to hold in a brave heroic stand whereas these people are just cornered corrupt to the bone pigs that lied and banked on more lies to try and take down a nation! Much different except both are sieges.
It has to be brutal shaking their very foundations. Has to be a lot of cursing, gnashing, black mailing, blackballing and serious despair. If we can bring them down, bring down Soetero and Hillary even without jail, just tie them up in courts and corruption for years I'd be happy but happier to see heads roll. MAGA!
Russia, Russia, Russia, Memo, Memo, Memo, meanwhile........
Those that squirm the most, expose themselves....the most.
Letdown.
MANY Americans are brainwashed fools who CANNOT THINK wihout the guberment controlled presstitutes telling them what to think.
For example, anyone with an IQ high enough to tie their shoes knows that Hillary Clinton committed multiple felonies with her private email server and that she should already be years into serving her prison sentence. NOBODY should have to wait to be told Hillary is guilty.
In the FISA scam, it has been obvious that Rosenstein set up Mueller to get Trump impeached. Because Trump did NOT fire Mueller, the RATS were in serious trouble and could NOT get Trump on Obstruction of Justice. Anyone following the facts coming from the House investigations has been aware of where this is going.
But NOT those who wait for the media to tell them the RIGHT answers. The lost and confused among us have to wait to be told. The indoctrination of the public is why one of America's most said phrases is "CONSPIRACY THEORY" even when the correct answers and evidence needed to prove what happened are available to the public.
No honor among liars and thieves. Their future closed door meetings will likely resemble this. Some will head for the tall grass and others will squeal, in hopes of getting the deal.
pretty much. not a thing in there that has not already been talked about nothing that pins this to the real lynch pins, obama and hillary besides the hillary campaign.
i was so hoping for a good rope stretching gallows squeaking neck popping eye bugging memo. all i got was a oh yeah knew that nunes, welcome aboard gop.
sorry for no caps shoulder surgery
Per FBN just now: Guess whose news report was used to help get the FISA warrant: Spikey Isikoff’s.
Isn’t that interesting....
And shortly thereafter, the word was out that Rogers had to be fired.
The Deep State does NOT deal with people who cross them. Fortunately for Rogers, he was too high up to make another example (like Seth Rich's fate).
You’re right. Thanks for adding that info to the thread. Ashton Carter and James Clapper asked Obama to fire him. They knew he wasn’t a Kool-Aid drinker.
Yes that is what happened. They had bugged the whole place. This was outrageous criminal activity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.