Posted on 02/02/2018 7:35:57 AM PST by fwdude
On January 25, 2018, the New York Times ran an op-ed by Sam Brinton under the headline, Tortured in Gay Conversion Therapy. (The online version posted January 24 read, I Was Tortured in Gay Conversion Therapy. And Its Still Legal in 41 States.) Brinton frequently speaks and testifies in favor of laws to prohibit licensed therapists from engaging in sexual orientation change efforts (which opponents refer to as conversion therapy) with minors. (FRCs defense of the right to choose such therapy can be found here).
Brinton gives a shocking, first-person account. It includes this:
The therapist ordered me bound to a table to have ice, heat and electricity applied to my body. I was forced to watch clips on a television of gay men holding hands, hugging and having sex. I was supposed to associate those images with the pain I was feeling to once and for all turn into a straight boy.
I have just one question for the New York Times. Did you make any effort to fact-check Brintons claims?
This is an opinion piece, you might respond. Since it reflects the writers opinion, it does not require fact-checking the way a news story doesdoes it?
The truth is, newspapers fact-check opinion pieces all the time. Various publications and websites routinely ask for links or other documentation for factual claims made in an opinion piece.
Brintons piece, though, was a first-person account of his own experience. How can you fact-check someones personal life experience?
One way might be by checking it against previous accounts that Brinton himself has given of his own story. He has, after all, been sharing these allegations in the public square since 2010. If there are inconsistencies in the way he has described his own experience on different occasions, it might at least raise some doubts about the credibility of the overall account.
Brintons Story Unverified
I first wrote about Brintons story three and a half years ago on the FRC Blog, in an August 2014 piece titled, Truth Matters in Ex-Gay Debate. Part of what follows is an edited version of what I wrote then, with added comments at the end.
Brintons story was apparently first captured, when he was a student at Kansas State, in a video interview by Nathan Manske of the Im from Driftwood project, which seeks to create an archive of stories on what its like to be LGBTQ throughout the world. Brintons story was captured on video in 2010, but received a burst of attention in October of 2011, when Manske shared it in the Huffington Post. Although the Huffington Post article remains online, a passage I quoted in 2014 does not (the web page says it was updated December 6, 2017). However, a detailed recounting of Brintons story (along with an edited version of the original video) remains online at the website of The New Civil Rights Movement. That account includes these details:
Physical therapy was my hands being tied down and blocks of ice being placed on my hands. Then pictures of men holding hands would be shown to be so that way I would associate the concept of the pain of the ice with a man touching me.
Then we went into heat. Coils would be wrapped around my hands and you would be able to turn the heat on or off. So now if we had a picture of a guy and a girl hugging, there was no pain. If we had a picture of a guy and a guy hugging, we had physical pain.
We then went into the Month of Hell, Brinton explains in the video below. The Month of Hell consisted of tiny needles being stuck into my fingers and then pictures of explicit acts between men would be shown and Id be electrocuted.
This report was so shocking that even some pro-gay media tried to verify this reportbut couldnt.
One of the inconsistencies pointed out by commenters on this article (on a gay website) was that Brintons Facebook page has a picture of the entire happy family at his college graduation ceremony, May 31, 2011despite the fact that Brinton said on the video that my dad has held a gun up to my head multiple times and warned Brinton that he would shoot me if I ever tried to walk in the door again. (Brinton responded in the comments section that my parents did come to my graduation since I am the very first person to graduate from college in my family. I am working on building a relationship to them . . . I was shocked they were there but so happy to see the love starting to rebuild.)
The Mystery Therapist
More importantly, Brinton, had not (in 2011) and (as far as I know) still has not, identified the counselor who allegedly engaged in these horrific practicesnot by name, not by address, not even by city and state where they occurred (more on that later).
Such omissions made even Wayne Besen, a prominent anti-ex-gay activist, reluctant to use Brintons story without further verification. Heres the full statement Besen posted in the comments section of the Queerty article which questioned Brintons story.
[emphasis added] Wayne Besen
Samuel came forward and told a story presumably in an effort to help others. There are groups like mine who would be thrilled to use his example to demonstrate the harm caused by ex-gay therapy. We live for real life examples like this.
However, until he provides more information to verify his experience, he makes it impossible for us to use him as an example. Indeed, it would be grossly irresponsible for us to do so.
If a group like mine puts out or promotes a story that turns out to be exaggerated or fake, the religious right would rake us through the coals and by extension the entire LGBT community. This would cast an ominous shadow on all of the legitimate ex-ex-gay testimonies that have helped so many people come out of the closet.
So, for the sake of the movement he is trying to help it is critical that Sam reveal exactly who the therapist was that tortured him. He could do this publicly or privately, but we need more information before we can use his narrative.
We very much hope he will provide enough information so we can help people by sharing his compelling story.
Sincerely,
Wayne Besen
Truth Wins Out
Oct 11, 2011 at 8:51 pm
Here is part of Brintons reply to Besen:
I was indirectly in contact with Wayne and although I know he wants me to send the information of the therapist that is simply not an option. Counselor after counselor has seen me revert to near suicidal tendencies when I try to dig deep into the memories of that time and I simply dont have his name. I can picture him clear as day in my nightmares but his name is not there. The movement cant use me I guess.
I have no problem with people not believing my story. It is not for me to try to prove. I dont want to be the poster-child of the anti-conversion therapy movement since graduate school at MIT is plenty tough as it is.
. . .
Oct 14, 2011 at 2:11 am
Memory and Forgetting
Note that Brinton says of his therapist, I can picture him clear as day in my nightmaresbut, as far as I know, he has also never provided a physical description of this individual.
The entire subject of whether childhood trauma can result in repressed memories (as Brinton apparently asserts) is a controversial one. See, for example, the American Psychological Associations Q&A on the topic here. It states:
Many clinicians who work with trauma victims believe that this dissociation is a persons way of sheltering himself or herself from the pain of the memory. Many researchers argue, however, that there is little or no empirical support for such a theory.
Even if the former theory is accepted, in Brintons case his amnesia is hardly sheltering [him] from the pain of the memory. It seems illogical that Brinton would be able to rememberand repeatedly recount in detail before cameras, in paid speaking engagements, and at legislative hearingsthe excruciating details of the torture he claims he experienced, while repressing (to the point of becoming near suicidal at efforts to retrieve them) only the memories of the detailssuch as name or citywhich might allow some verification of his account.
Other Discrepancies in Brintons Story
Defenders of the right of people with same-sex attractions to pursue therapy aimed at reducing those attractions last year posted a YouTube video highlighting other problems with the story Brinton has told. For example, in one videotaped speech Brinton said that his therapy was provided by a doctor. Yet in one of the first written accounts of his story, from August of 2011, it says his therapy came at the hands of the session leader¿who Sam specifies was a religious therapist and not a doctor. In yet another videoapparently of Brinton testifying in support of a legislative therapy banhe says specifically that he was treated by a licensed psychotherapist. Note that legislative bans on sexual orientation change efforts or conversion therapy (a term never actually used by its practitioners) apply only to licensed professionals, not to religious counselors.
Even the state in which Brinton underwent his alleged therapy is unclear. In the 2010 Driftwood video, Brinton says he grew up in Perry, Iowa. When the video was re-posted at the Huffington Post in October 2011, the article repeated that Sam was raised in rural Iowa. However, the Bay Windows account from August 2011 (reposted at LGBTQ Nation) said that Brinton endured years of reparative therapy designed to cure him of his homosexuality while living in Kansas. Only two paragraphs later, however, it says, Sam was a pre-teen, living with his parents in a conservative religious mission in Florida, when his ordeal began. In his New York Times op-ed, he says it all happened when I was a middle schooler in Florida. So which was itIowa, Kansas, or Florida?
Has Brinton Changed?
There is one more discrepancy. In his Times op-ed, Brinton says his conversion therapy was a trauma that was meant to erase my existence as a newly out bisexual. This is the first time I have heard Brinton refer to himself as bisexual. The August 2011 Bay Windows article begins with the sentence, Samuel Brinton is not afraid to say hes gay.
Ironically, if Brinton went from identifying as gay in 2011 to identifying as bisexual and gender fluid in 2018, maybe he himself is proof that change is possible after all.
Think they mean sexual preference.
If conversion therapy is made illegal, does that mean that the homosexuals can no longer try to recruit?
Not true. They’ll still push conversion therapy on the youngest “transgender” minors.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.