To: jazusamo
I haven’t noticed the FBI or DOJ offering to fill in the “omissions” so that the memo will not be misleading.
20 posted on
02/01/2018 4:18:11 PM PST by
Hugh the Scot
("The days of being a keyboard commando are over. It's time to get some bloody knuckles." -Drew68)
To: Hugh the Scot
I haven’t noticed the FBI or DOJ offering to fill in the "omissions" so that the memo will not be misleading. That's because it's not their job to fill in "omissions" in a House committee report.
Their job was to review the memo and identify anything in it that compromises national security or law enforcement matters.
31 posted on
02/01/2018 4:24:02 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: Hugh the Scot
I haven’t noticed the FBI or DOJ offering to fill in the “omissions” so that the memo will not be misleading. Of course not, that would risk "sources and methods" of classified intelligence, like relying on foreign ex-spies concocting opposition research with campaign donations laundered through a law firm to hide the origin.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson