Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th_VA

If they get 70% of their funding from government sources then they aren’t even a “charity” at all by any objective measure — let alone a religious organization.


40 posted on 01/28/2018 8:19:42 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Funding for the program not overall. Since CC and other private charities providing services are non-profits their tax returns should reflect that status and show they are not getting rich off of such funding.

Legitimate services for legitimate refugees are not in danger. Narrowing the definition of refugee means that more of those who are genuinely in need will be allowed in the U.S. which is how it should be. Most likely Trump has decided to stick with the correct definition under US law.


70 posted on 01/28/2018 12:17:18 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson