Not sure how "quiet" it is, since they are publishing it! Sabre rattling or threat?
1 posted on
01/24/2018 11:42:58 AM PST by
FrogMom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: FrogMom
Alternatively, it could just be a credible deterrent to prevent a North Korean aggression of some sort.
44 posted on
01/24/2018 1:13:49 PM PST by
BeauBo
To: FrogMom
This is all conjecture on the part of the publisher/author.
Click bait that got me to click.
47 posted on
01/24/2018 1:17:46 PM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: FrogMom
One part possible political psyops and one part naive ignorance that can’t differentiate between standard practices of being prepared and “readying” in some immediate sense.
53 posted on
01/24/2018 2:03:53 PM PST by
Wuli
To: FrogMom
Preparing not just for a tactical strike, but a tactical NUCLEAR STRIKE.
RRRIIIIIGHT!
54 posted on
01/24/2018 2:08:35 PM PST by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: FrogMom
key word: “appear”
Appear to whom? On what basis?
61 posted on
01/24/2018 5:43:36 PM PST by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: FrogMom
Well at least its not a STRATEGIC strike....
To: FrogMom
The Olympics start 2/8 and go for two weeks plus assembly time prior to the 8th. I seriously doubt we are contemplating a nuke strike in an area that will have just been the site of the Olympics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson