To: billorites
2 posted on
01/21/2018 11:51:12 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: FreedomPoster; billorites; bitt; LucyT; Liz
Another error and housekeeping flub-up.
My head spins.
The FIX is in.
26 posted on
01/21/2018 11:58:03 AM PST by
ptsal
( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
To: FreedomPoster
This destruction is evidentiary proof of criminal intent to obstruct justice. If these devices were gov’t owned, there was a statutory duty to preserve the communications.
To: FreedomPoster
The first thing that came to my mind and the first post, your post, said it. Well, well, well, HOW CONVENIENT!
52 posted on
01/21/2018 12:10:05 PM PST by
Fungi
(Eat mushrooms often.)
To: FreedomPoster
Because they show proof of a conspiracy to commit SEDITION.
57 posted on
01/21/2018 12:13:26 PM PST by
Hotlanta Mike
("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
To: FreedomPoster
87 posted on
01/21/2018 12:42:59 PM PST by
353FMG
To: FreedomPoster
If I were to destroy evidence like the FBI it would be a Felony and my freedom would be taken away along with societal trust in the form of loosing my voting rights and rights to own or use a gun for life.
So... many FBI agents need a new line of work when they get out of jail right?
Of course this is not just destruction of evidence, this is a much more serious charge of sedition ...
90 posted on
01/21/2018 12:44:47 PM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: FreedomPoster
98 posted on
01/21/2018 12:51:30 PM PST by
Kozak
(DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson