He’s back....
So earlier today you like the members here and now we’re whackos? You never asked me for info. What kind of info? Do you know how to read?
You are an arrogant richard cranium, here are a few illustrations:
(a) you make accusations based on false assumptions using loaded terminology - example, “you were all too much in love with the concept”. IN LOVE WITH??? wth? What “concept”? meaningless droppings.
(b) your attitude of total superiority puts you on a par with Nurse Ratchet. We’re all “sheep here” and need YOU as a sheep dog. What a bucket of puke.
(c) your know-it-all statements that are generalizations and never once, that I saw, related to any of the substance of Q’s actual comments, and your great source is rational wiki, which I am familiar with, and it is a leftist puke “debunking” site
(d) your obvious task of being a minder here is to divert, shut up the conversation, and derail the topic of Q, and never once actually addressing the specific topic shows you as a troll with a job to do
The members of FR can do quite well without your barking. I’ve never cottoned to chihuahuas.
Treating it like the joke it is. If you want to provide evidence for Q being a work of non-fiction, please do.
Meet Q.
Found him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmLnBYzFhYQ
If the Q subject bothers you so much, it's a big site and no one's holding you here.
You and others have stated your skepticism, and repeating it multiple times in the same thread will merely tend to give many/most the impression that 'he doth protest too much'.
But it's your rep, so sully away.
Absolutely, for sure. Agreed. Nice, accurate post.
Excuse me, jeremiah, but in this particular case the proper term is "punting dog". (*yip!*)
Get him, Jeremiah!!!!