I understand that viewpoint.
But I would say that we've been through the old, in-your-face battle of "Bill Clinton is a rapist!" and that didn't go well for us. Too vast a leap for most voters. That sort of culture change would threaten their worldview. Bill is a nice guy, right? Hillary would never put up with that, right? We voted for him, right? Bill couldn't possibly be a rapist, so stop talking crazy.
And again with Obama's birth certificate. This got diluted into "He's not a citizen" and all kinds of other off-target claims. Was he a Natural Born Citizen as specified in the Constitution? No one wanted to address that. A little too complex. And, again, the culture change was too vast. What? You mean Obama is a foreign agent? His education was paid for by a Saudi prince? You mean 8 years after 9/11 we elected a Muslim who was advised by Muslim terrorists? Then we elected him a second time? It's too much. It's crazy! Stop talking so crazy.
Now we are in very deep and very unbelievable waters. The average person cannot possible accept this new revelation. They will resist the ideas. The media will twist the ideas. If this is all true, it is horrible beyond belief. And the fact that is is horrible beyond belief makes it super easy for people to just not believe it.
Dripping this out slowly over time so that more and more people can begin the grasp the enormity of it and start to "see it for themselves" is a new strategy. It if different from how we approached Bill Clinton or Obama. Maybe this approach is going to work.
But simply going to the MSM and making "wild claims" about rape or birth certificates or about the CIA running a secret government and how elections are basically rigged? Our government was helping North Korea nuke us? What?? That's just not going to convince people if you just come right out with it. The truth is too crazy, which for our enemies is a very effective disguise and defense.
A subtle approach might work better than the old methods.
You might ask yourself the following question.
If a lot of what Q says is actually false, why would someone want you to believe it?
Small lies can be doubted. Big Lies might actually be easier to sell.
Small, simple conspiracies can be uncovered and understood and prosecuted. A Big, world-bending conspiracy which blatantly turns everything on its head? It's so unbelievable no one would ever investigate it. No one except Trump.
Q post Hall of Fame material right there, goodman.
A must read for all deniers.
Neuro Linguistic Programming research has indicated that often, that is exactly true.
I agree, those (most of America) who have not kept up with the events of the last horrifying 9 years and the thousands of layers of traitorous acts by O’Muslim and his ilk would be totally overwhelmed by the complexity of what has actually happened and is still happening today.
God Bless Trump and the other few good men and women (Sara Carter for example) who have stepped into this fray to save our nation. I marvel at Trump’s grit and strength.
We’ve been on the case since 2008’s election cycle. We knew O’Bola was a muslim plant, ineligible, Alinksy-ite, multiple fake SS numbers etc...so much information.
The Sheeple would never believe the whole true story if told all at once.
Damn Obama to Hell, him and all his evil minions.
He’ll share space there with HildBeast and all the other abortion-lovers. Schumer and Durban and Pelosi get special extra hot treatment too. All of ‘em are just pure evil.