Posted on 01/18/2018 7:06:41 AM PST by EliRoom8
President Donald Trump corrected his Chief of Staff John Kelly after he said that the president had evolved on the wall. Theres been an evolutionary process that this president has gone through, Kelly said in an interview with Fox News host Bret Baier, pointing out that Trump had very definitely changed his attitude towards DACA recipients and the wall.
But Trump pushed back on Twitter against the suggestion that he had evolved on the wall.
The Wall is the Wall, it has never changed or evolved from the first day I conceived of it, Trump said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Surprised CNN even aired this. I wonder if they followed up with “experts” saying those people are just ignorant.
Nailed it!
Reported on CBS This Morning,
NorDUH O’Donnell excitedly exclaimed “Trump at odds with his chief of staff”.
I think its the other way around, Kelly apparently forgets who he reports to.
What Trump supporters has Kelly eliminated?
Fox News has joined CNN and MSNBC in reporting Fake News. I just tweeted this after hearing Melissa Francis lie about the presidents position on the Wall.
1/18/18, 8:29 AM
@FoxNews @MelissaAFrancis is wrong or anyone else is wrong when they say Pres @realDonaldTrump has changed his mind on a wall. He said in many interviews during the primary that land w natural barriers, as in mountains and rivers, will not need a wall constructed.
You’re a humorless putz. Please set your hair on fire and run around. The dogs bark but Trump’s caravan moves on.
Look at them here! All hysterical because Kelly said something on tv. After a year of this, intelligent people ignore what “his people” say and watch what Trump does. It saves a lot of money on Prozac and anti-anxiety drugs.
Only around over emotional females who remind me of Rosie O'Donnell :)
(See DJTs classic debate line to another dunce named Kelly)
Overly emotional? You’re practically bawling into your cornflakes about something Kelly said on tv. Meanwhile, I’m calm and cool and watching my investments notch up significantly. Thank you, Mr. Trump!
Yes, there’s a fact deficit on this thread. There is a legalistic, gotcha mindset that will always pounce on anything that can be construed as Trump caving. Of course, the practitioners don’t believe they’re playing lalaland gotcha. They think they are perceptively spotting the Trump weaknesses that his supporters miss.
On the other side are the big picture people who figured out some time ago how Trump rolls. He doesn’t waffle and then send some underling out to take the waffle on a test flight. He gives his officials quite a bit of latitude, but when they go off course he steps in to set them straight. ‘Straight,’ being whatever aligns with Trump’s campaign promises; he made a deal with his supporters and he intends to keep his end of it.
And so it goes...
Yes, you’re over emotional. Your constant name calling, in place of debate, gives you away. BTW, I’ve found over the years that people who brag about their investments usually are living month to month. Just a thought.
‘Kelly also has eliminated from the white house most trump supporters.’
A list of the Trump supporters Kelly has eliminated would be helpful. Thank you in advance.
During the Campaign, then Candidate Trump always talked about Building a Wall where it was needed and where there were no Natural Barriers.
He never said there would be a Wall along every inch of the Southern Border.
Yeah, under Obama I did live month to month as did many good Americans when my healthcare went from $150 a month to $4,000 a month. And I wasn’t bragging about MY investments, dopey. I was bragging about Mr. Trump’s tax cuts and the cutting of regulations that have unleashed the stock market and entrepreneurial spirit of Americans.
To quote another snowflake here: try and keep up.
They think they are perceptively spotting the Trump weaknesses that his supporters miss.
This is IT in a nutshell, FW. Absolutely spot on. And when they are proven wrong over and over again, they retreat for a day or two and then show up again at the next so-called misstep.
Yet more name calling hysteria? Drop the Cory Booker act, ok? Try some sophistication, if not politically at least interpersonally. One can both support DJT *and* believe he has some real POS in his cabinet. But go ahead, continue supporting Kelly as he trips all over the wall and DACA issues. I never bought into that 3-D chess nonsense, but other, apparently as politically childish as you, seem to.
‘And when they are proven wrong over and over again, they retreat for a day or two and then show up again at the next so-called misstep.’
Right—and that’s the part that makes you wonder. If you kept stubbing your toe on a certain rock, it would take you no time at all to learn to avoid that rock. Yet the same people whose sky-is-falling bc Trump is about to break a campaign promise keeps blowing up in their faces like exploding cigars, keep doing the same thing over and over and over.
Hmm.
I know at least a couple of them are Never-Trumpers. They don’t care if they’re wrong; they just relish the periodic excuse to dump on Trump.
What explains the rest? Are they just nervous nellies of limited intellectual capacity, who simply cannot comprehend the way Trump operates?
Who knows. It gets really old, though. They could be relaxing and enjoying the Trump presidency, but instead they’re having panic attacks every few days. If it’s no fun for us, it’s hard to see how it’s much more enjoyable for them.
Best guess: they think this panic-routine makes them look smart. While the Trump sheep keep on believing Trump’s campaign promises, the ‘smart,’ people know he’s just waiting for the big chance to backstab his base. Why such an absurdity would make anybody feel superior is a mystery, but that’s likely at the bottom of it.
Your ludicrous assumptions of who or what I support outside of President Trump is about as astute as your assumption that I was bragging about my investments. Of course, you couldn’t give Mr. Trump a second of praise on his accomplishments that are starting to turn this economy around. No, you want to double-down on some tv appearance by his chief-of-staff. Stop calling other people unsophisticated and look in the mirror.
‘But go ahead, continue supporting Kelly’
I thought the party in question was supporting Trump, not Kelly. Saying, ‘listen to Trump, not to Kelly,’ certainly seems more like Trump support than Kelly support, no?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.