Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tomkat

In other words, they are intentionally forcing encounters at times when the target party is least likely to be able to make rational decisions, or at times when someone might reasonably suspect a person at the door could be dangerous and thus arm themselves before answering.

This is Branch Davidian enforcement ethics. Unless the person simply never leaves the house, they are picking the most dangerouns possible times to serve warrants. That’s a terrible decision for everyone involved.


90 posted on 01/18/2018 10:40:25 AM PST by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator

Lotta times premesis have been under surveillance before service of a warrant, and the hour of reckoning is selected basis observed traffic patterns.

You got the target of the warrant heading out of the house regularly at 7am, 6:30 sounds like a perfectly peachy moment to lower the boom.

Unfortunately, in this case, there was another criminal in the house who brought some pre-emptive BOOM of their own. Increasingly, that is going to have to be a planned-for possibility; perhaps send a robot to the door...?


96 posted on 01/18/2018 10:57:48 AM PST by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson