Posted on 01/16/2018 3:55:42 PM PST by RoosterRedux
Interesting....
If you create a ping list, I’d much appreciate if you could add me please. Thank you.
"big" is a relative term. There are clearly a lot of actions taking place that are a steps in the right direction:
You are talking about the Twitter account?! GaH! Now I am spreading disinformation! ARGGGHHH!!! Sorry and thank you for catching me before I spread it around like the flu!
Miller maybe, but I’d be surprised if it were Jared. He just doesn’t seem too bright. Miller, OTOH, is a brilliant star.
Says who and where is the proof?
It seems to me that an individual now posting in total anonymity would be more specific with his messages rather than posting cryptic crap that allows his followers to interpret them as they wish........
P.S.: I just got this personal email from Q anon: "chickens are about to fly, the fox is looking for moles and winter is getting colder......That is all"
Forget Gitmo; it’s too nice. Alcatraz is just sitting there waiting for the pitter patter of criminal feet. Lock up everyone there and continue the tours. It would be fun to walk through and see Hillary behind bars. Everyone could point and laugh.
Only slightly interesting in and of itself.
More interesting, if my impression is correct, is that Q Anon seems to be getting more open attention now from the disloyal opposition.
Because of the heart attack gun maybe?
April LaJune i unsubscribed to her. She gets her information from highly questionable places and insists it's good information. Which is what she did with the marines landing in Langley CIA building. I looked at her sources all hear say. "i heard helicopters fly over they where heading in the direction of Langley." That doesn't equal to them landing there but that is what the article claimed.
Finding level headed people looking at this is nearly impossible. Which in itself is kinda of funny.
It's like looking into the Las Vegas shooting. Clearly the FBI is covering things up but people come up with the wildest ideas on what might be taking place.
Huh??????
It is Barron ...
[“”You guys know what this represents? Maybe it’s the calm before the storm,” President Donald Trump told reporters ominously as he posed with military commanders and their spouses in October 2017.”]
I always liked how he said: “You’ll find out”.
Just posted on a different Q thread, since no one seems to have an answer for either of these questions:
I guess I might be a party pooper, but can anyone name one (1) thing that Q has predicted in advance, with enough specificity to have actually prepared anyone for an actual event?
I realize it’s fun to look back after events actually happened, to try to determine if Q might have left you a clue to something that did happen, but if he wasn’t able to ever actually tip you off of anything specific in advance, is the post-analysis of his tweets really of any value?
Seriously, just asking. Thank you!
What a wonderful thought!
Didn’t Bill Clinton himself state to someone that he is not in charge. That there are people above him whom he has to answer to?
How do we know this Q isn’t just the new Ulstermann?
Actually the codes are like this one:
coded:
"DEFCON 1"
"none nuclear"
"not to be taken literally."
This represented the Hawaii "false" alarm Q gave three days before the event.
Hi Rooster....
I have just lately been reading some of this Qanon, and I have to say that it’s confusing. Perhaps I’m just not used to following this type of posting or don’t really know how to read it, but it often leaves me scratching my head.
Having said that, I hope and pray every day that the curtain is pulled way back. All the way back to the Clintons and their criminal activity in Arkansas.
It's not done to create mystery. He is communicating with individuals on his team, much like George Webb does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.