Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sodpoodle

It sounds like the non-urban areas want to be separated from the southern urban areas, because of the way they are governed.

I understand their rationale. Don’t know how this works...they make it sound similar to the way West Virginia was formed as an independent state.

If the Constitution supports this type of activity, I can go with it.


6 posted on 01/16/2018 7:55:33 AM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel
"If the Constitution supports this type of activity, I can go with it."

It doesn't. The Constitution expressly forbids creating new states from already existing state's land without the consent of that state's government.

Meaning the California State Assembly would have to vote to approve this. I'm sure that's going to happen.

10 posted on 01/16/2018 7:58:48 AM PST by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

I don’t think you’d need to change the US Constitution. California would need to approve it using whatever means is applicable and then the Congress would need to approve it.


36 posted on 01/16/2018 8:12:44 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

The Constitution says only Congress has the power to change the boundaries of existing states.


98 posted on 01/16/2018 11:54:29 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson