Mr. Cooper:
Would you rather have the temperature going up or going down? And exactly which past computer model was able to predict future temperatures accurately? Just wondering.
These fraudsters just won't give up!
They painted themselves into corner when actual Science facts did not support their vision of historical "climate."
They doubled up when real science invalidated their agenda.
Eventually, they couldn't support their own agenda, so their option was to fake the records by arbitrarily adjusting the historical science data to fit their agenda. Blatantly so.
Then they had the balls to refuse access to the original science data which through a disaster of judgement by someone(s), was entrusted to a university professor with a criminal bent.
He erased the original data (hundreds of years worth,) and refused access by real Scientists to his deletions and additions and considered the matter "proprietary."
The quintessential violation and contradiction of the Scientific Method.
Changing the data to fit a twisted version of reality is simply not nice.
Just Google "East Anglia" + Climate Fraud...
Unchecked stupidity is stupendously expensive
I Couldn't agree more, you ignorant imbecile!
Science has no room within it for hysteria.
Not now, not ever!
Sure. When real estate values in Miami Beach and Manhattan start plummeting, then I’ll pay attention. Until then, this is hokum.
Science uses the scientific method.
AGW/climate-change “science” does not use the scientific method.
Any questions?
To the author: Tell it to the Chinese and India, then get back to us next century.
He’s right, but not in how he means it.
Unchecked climate change hysteria will be stupefyingly expensive.