Posted on 01/14/2018 4:21:10 AM PST by grundle
When Ivana Hollan, MD, came to Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital in October 2015 as a visiting scientist, it was more than just a tremendous professional opportunity. For the rheumatologist, who is living with myeloma, traveling 3,500 miles from her Norway home to the Longwood Medical Area also put her next door to Dana-Farber and close to cancer care that the Norwegian government has refused to pursue or insure due to its high cost.
For this and other reasons, Hollan extended her academic appointments and began ongoing treatment at Dana-Farbers Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center.
Despite the obvious benefits, including being cared for by hematologist/oncologist Paul Richardson, MD, who is making remarkable inroads against the disease, it was not an easy decision. Hollans husband, son, and daughter live in Norway, but she knows that returning home could compromise her health.
Everybody talks about how wonderful Norways health care is, and that was my experience until I needed medical treatment for my cancer, says Hollan, 52. I never imagined that the government would not be willing to support new oncology drugs and treatments. Its sad to be away from my family, but here I am cared for by an incredible team that treats me like family in a beautiful healing environment that doesnt look or feel like a hospital. It has helped me put aside my sadness and look to the future.
Hollan was not eligible for treatment in Norway because the government run health care providers there felt the state-of-the-art drugs needed for her care were too expensive. At Dana-Farber, after her disease progressed following initial systemic therapy and maintenance, Richardson offered her an immunotherapy-based clinical trial in August 2016 that has stabilized her disease for the past year, and which she has tolerated moderately well.
Hollans story has made headlines back home, where she and others are pressuring the Norwegian government to reconsider its stance on costly experimental treatments like immunotherapy. The combination of drugs she is on at Dana-Farber are approved for use by the Federal Drug Administration in the United States and by the European Medicines Agency for public hospitals in several European countries but are near-impossible to get in Norway.
Novel therapies have made substantial improvements in patient outcomes in myeloma globally during the last decade-plus, and the greatest clinical benefit has been seen in the United States where access to new treatments has been the best, says Richardson. Nationally, the prognosis for overall patient survival has gone from 3-5 years to 7-10, and in our practice we are seeing some patients survive 20 years or more from diagnosis with active disease. This constitutes remarkable progress and hope, and it is truly our privilege to offer this kind of therapeutic opportunity to Ivana.
Hollan splits her weeks between work and treatment, with high praise for the total patient care she receives at Dana-Farber. She loves being greeted at the Yawkey Center by the sounds of a volunteer pianist or harpist and receiving acupuncture in the Leonard P. Zakim Center for Integrative Therapies and Healthy Living.
One important advocate is tracking much of her journey: Her daughter, Barbora, a student at the Norwegian Film Institute, is training to be a documentarian and has made Ivanas cancer experience a college project. For six weeks this summer and fall, she stayed with Ivana in Boston and recorded her mothers day-to-day experiences.
The driving motive behind the movie, and what pushes it forward, is the political fight, but its also about how much fun you can still have while living with cancer, says Barbora Hollan. I was worried it would be emotionally hard on me, but its been great to see the whole picture of my mothers life. Ive found it difficult keeping up with her. This optimism is why Ivana has a response for Richardsons initial prognosis. He expects me to live to 80, she says. Why not 85?
I bend my knee in gratitude every morning.
May Almighty God bless and keep our Free Republic!
I image her treatment is paid for by the same people who pay for the medical care of illegal Mexicans.
Why should the taxpayers of Norway pay for it?
It's not part of the deal, a deal they freely chose and, AFAIK, are quite happy with.
That is good analogy on a few levels. In socialism, people are cattle...
Clinical trials in Europe is big business
I image her treatment is paid for by the same people who pay for the medical care of illegal Mexicans.
State taxpayers? I hope not. She is a doctor. I hope she is paying for it, even if she has purchased an insurance that gives her some discount.
The therapies would have made it through the first rounds of clinical trials. It’s not like going to mexico for a latte enema treatment.
For the most part, drugs are tested on the expected patient population. So if you want to have a drug approved in Europe, you have to test it there. Even if it is already tested in the US.
I am not so sure about human clinical trials but when I worked for a pharmaceutical (granted in finance not on the science side) I saw a lot of invoices for animal trials from companies in located Europe, many in the Netherlands mostly monkey and beagles. I am not sure why that was or if that has changed since the early 2000s. We did have a small animal lab (small in both the size of the lab and as in the size of the animals mice and rats) in our facility in Baltimore.
Thanks for the link!
If you are outside that age bracket or you have something that will require long term treatment you are out of luck. Go die you useless eater.
I’m with you, I hope not also, but I’d say the odds are very high that taxpayers are footing the bill
That is a picture of the relation of the individual to the government vs. the relation of the individual to his family. The family places value in the individual, beyond the numbers. The government bureaucrat places value on his own family, other individuals not so much.
Blast you for making me laugh with cracked ribs.
That is excellent. It will be interesting to see what happens in Norway in the future when the oil money starts to decline and if they take in hordes of Muslims. So much for their socialist happiness.
Death Panels:
Sorry, it is not economical to save your life
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.