Now they even admit it.
ComDem Insanity driving a crazed anti-Trump Media.
Absolutely unbelievable that this continues after a full year in office.
Now, back to business of exposing the FBI and the DOJ illegal actions. That will make the Looney Left blow a headgasket again.
So what if he did say it? If the countries were heaven on earth, they wouldn’t want to come here would they?
IIRC, there have been any number of presidents in my lifetime that used cuss words in “private” meetings. Does Dick Durbin seriously want us to believe he has never used a cuss word?
Wouldn’t be my choice of words, but it is the blunt truth, there are countries in the world that are hell on earth, and run by tyrants.
bump for later
Rule Number 4.
Ignore it. Limbaugh had a great riff on this and how it is no big deal...leftists have us all marinating in their filth and vulgarity and now are using Rule number 4.
Saul Alinskys Rules from Rules for Radicals
Saul Alinsky describes 24 rules in Rules for Radicals. Of those 24 rules, 13 are rules of power tactics:
1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy
thinks you have.
2. Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the
enemy.
4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. Ridicule is mans most potent weapon.
6. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and
actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing
itself.
10. The major premise for tactics is the development of
operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will
break through into its counterside.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive
alternative.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
The remaining 11 rules Alinsky describes are concerned with the ethics of means and ends:
1. Ones concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with ones personal interest in the issue Accompanying this rule is the parallel one that ones concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with ones distance from the scene of conflict.
2. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.
3. In war the end justifies almost any means.
4. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
5. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
6. The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
7. Generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.
8. The morality of a means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
9. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as being unethical.
10. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.
11. Goals must be phrased in general terms like Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, Of the Common Welfare, Pursuit of Happiness, or Bread and Peace.
Might see some more televised debates - Trump has them by the short hairs and is starting to pluck.....the idiot “judge” on the 9th Circuit isn’t going to save them....
Suddenly the FBI can do no wrong. Why, it destroys their morale to even suggest out loud that they might be mistaken about something. Until the MSM starts reviling the FBI publicly again, and concocting conspiracy theories about them, they are suspected members of the deep state.
The only clarification that perhaps, may have been needed was to mean the Governments of those countries making them shitholes. The corruption in Haiti and African countries is pretty well known and documented.
btt
Looks like SH!T-HOLE-GATE got knocked off the headlines by FAKE-INCOMING-MISSILE.
The press hates Trump because most of their great stories come from our ‘liberal elite’ intelligence services. And that group hates Trump. If they want to keep getting the good stuff they better join the liberal elite hate train.
Yes, the Washington Post and New York Times are ‘fed’ by liberal elites in our intelligence service.
Fed by men paid to protect all of us who use the resources we give them to control the press for the benefit of white liberal elites... and to keep that corrupt group in power.
Thugs who protect the Iranian Mullahs do the same thing in Iran... the protesters need to see their ‘elites’ for what they are... and their ‘intelligence services’ for what they are... goons protecting the corrupt powerful...
Show the ‘intelligence services’ the respect they’ve earned: scorn.
If democrats violated a long-standing tradition of not revealing specifics of things said within the Oval Office, if there exists a recording (likely), and DJT did not use the language attributed to him, WH should release that portion of the recording. It will serve notice that further lies will be refuted, with proof.