Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Not President Oprah?
National Review ^ | Jan 08, 2018 | Kevin D. Williamson

Posted on 01/08/2018 11:08:27 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom

She’s unqualified, but she has what might matter most: ratings.

Here is an error I will confess: Having long expected a celebrity-driven personality-cult presidential campaign to emerge among Democrats, I did not fully appreciate how much more powerful a celebrity-driven personality-cult presidential campaign would be among Republicans.

The origins of my error are obvious in retrospect: Because Democrats have a much cozier relationship with Hollywood and the other foundries of celebrity, it seemed natural that a celebrity–political alliance would take root on the left. But I failed to account for the fact that Republicans are no less vulnerable to celebrity than are Democrats — and that Republicans are starved for celebrity. Imagine a Scott Baio–level has-been speaking before a rapt audience at the Democratic National Convention or a celebrity on the order of Ted Nugent leaving Democrats overawed. Sure, Republicans have a few big stars: Clint Eastwood and

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . ?

As a cultural force, authentic celebrity of the kind enjoyed by Donald Trump and Oprah Winfrey is orders of magnitude more powerful than the ersatz celebrity of politics, journalism, and cable news. Sean Hannity’s Fox News program was the most popular thing on cable news in 2017, with an audience about 5 percent the size of that of The Big Bang Theory or Thursday Night Football, neither of which is currently at the top of its ratings game. Even with wall-to-wall broadcasting, the State of the Union address typically gets an audience far less than half the size of the Super Bowl’s.

MSNBC is for obvious reasons riding high in the Trump era, but more than ten times as many people tuned in to watch Oprah interview Michelle Obama as watch an entire day’s worth of MSNBC programming. That’s what happens when real celebrity meets politics.

Presidents come and go. Oprah is as fixed as the stars.

Of course she is categorically unqualified for the office. But have fun imagining Republicans making that case in the shadow of Donald J. Trump, Very Stable Genius™. Oprah’s formal educational attainments are modest, whatever political ideas she has seem to be largely undeveloped, and she has an obvious and regrettable weakness for quacks and cranks of sundry sorts: anti-vaccine nuts, Dr. Oz, doctors who use Tarot cards to diagnose thyroid problems, etc. She is a one-woman public-health menace.

At the same time, she more than embodies the virtues attributed to President Trump: She’s a real billionaire, a self-made one at that, a woman who started with nothing and became wildly successful with bupkis to go on but her own grit and shrewdness. President Trump loves to talk about ratings. You want ratings? Oprah has ratings.

The Democrats would do worse — a great deal worse — if they decide they need a celebrity: Sean Penn, Ashley Judd, Jerry Springer. (In the case of Jerry Springer, they did do worse: He was the mayor of Cincinnati.) And Oprah would have some potential celebrity contenders of some substance: Mark Cuban for one, Mark Zuckerberg for another.

But the Democrats don’t really need a celebrity. They have a great talent for making celebrities out of ordinary politicians, converting a clan of low-rent grifters and halfwits such as the Kennedys into an ersatz royal family and making the lightly accomplished Barack Obama into a kind of rock-star messiah for the Davos set. The Democrats have a more fruitful relationship with celebrity because, unlike most Republicans, they understand the transactional nature of the celebrity-politician relationship. Movie stars get into political activism for the same reason they sometimes take six months off to do serious theater: They want to feel smart, maybe even a little profound, and, more important, they want to be perceived as that, as intellectually serious. Democratic politicians connect with celebrities because they want to be seen as cool. Smart and cool is a very powerful combination for public-relations purposes, and it’s not what you get when you pair up Mike Pence with the Duck Dynasty guys. Republicans have a poor handle on the uses of glamour.

But presidential politics in the post-party era — or, more precisely, in the era of strong partisanship and weak parties, in Julia Azari’s useful formulation — is quickly devolving into pure tribalism, a form of cultural totem-jockeying. And that means that old-fashioned things such as public-policy analysis, party platforms, and even ideology are growing ever more attenuated. The question isn’t whether you belong to the free-trade party or to the anti-trade party — I defy you to say convincingly which is which — but whether you are a Bernie person or a Cruz person, whether you are Team Oprah or Team Trump.

And if it comes down to Oprah vs. Trump, Republicans should keep a wary eye on the ratings.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nevertrump; noprah; oprah2020; shetoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
If only everyone were as smart as the people at the National Review we would have a truly qualified President Clinton and everyone would marvel at how efficiently things were run. Instead, we're stuck with a celebrity on par with the other dumb celebrity Ronald Reagan.
1 posted on 01/08/2018 11:08:27 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Wow. NRO was dead to me a while ago, now this?

This is beyond doubling-down.


2 posted on 01/08/2018 11:15:17 PM PST by KJC1 (Illegals: One hand out and the other one flipping us the bird)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

I see a parallel between the “Messiah” and “the Oprah” being touted for president on the basis of one speech. We know how that turned out.


3 posted on 01/08/2018 11:16:07 PM PST by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

4 posted on 01/08/2018 11:20:58 PM PST by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Williamson just had to evoke this meme, didn’t he.


5 posted on 01/08/2018 11:22:33 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Barack with a vagina. NO THANKS.


6 posted on 01/08/2018 11:23:30 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

If only the brain dead morons, over at NR, actually knew the FACTS about ANYTHING, anything at all ( Oprah doesn’t have a “good ratings” anymore and lost most of her audience, way back in 2007-8, when she wen t to bat for Obama ! ), perhaps their anti-Trump articles might at least contain one, JUST ONE,kernel of truth in them. But these mordantly STUPID #NEVERTRUMPERS are as bad as the Hilary and Bernie cultists!


7 posted on 01/08/2018 11:29:48 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
The National Review is full of self-satisfied creeps. Without the benefit of Williams being honest enough to state it, the whole premise of the article is that the classless boobs of America are now stupid enough to be ready for an entire government of composed of celebrities.

FU Williams. America elected President Ronald Reagan, a former actor who began a political career 20 years before becoming President, against the advice of our “batters “and he turned out to be the one to achieve victory in the cold war with and to bring America back from the economic brink.

Williams derides President Trump as a celebrity but he's much more than that. He is very astute businessman and self-made billionaire who made his money in the cutthroat New York real estate and construction business. Trump is an executive not just a celebrity. Also Trump was a celebrity because he knows how to manipulate journalists and the new media for free.

No matter what the MSM talking heads and the professional politicians say, President Trump is playing them like a fiddle.

8 posted on 01/08/2018 11:29:48 PM PST by WMarshal (John McCain is the turd in America's punch bowl. McLame cannot even fake an injury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Oparah drinks. She was taking that she makes the best margaritas and that she now coaches people on how to do shots. Ok....


9 posted on 01/08/2018 11:38:02 PM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

Talking she coaches shots on the Kelly and Ryan show. I bet some alcoholics fell right off the wagon after that show.


10 posted on 01/08/2018 11:40:59 PM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

I’m always impressed when a writer can work ‘ersatz’ into an article twice.


11 posted on 01/09/2018 12:15:09 AM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

LOL, me too. Or is that hashtagMEToo?


12 posted on 01/09/2018 12:28:13 AM PST by KJC1 (Illegals: One hand out and the other one flipping us the bird)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
I'm actually scared of a Oprah Winfrey run. It's the kind of brain dead idolization they would eat up, along with the low information voters. It really all depends on the 2018 elections and that historically goes to the party out of power. What could save this is the economy is going to be running in high gear.

The Senate could possibly reach the magic 60+ Republicans need to REALLY blow the RATS out of the District of Corruption. If that happens there is not a RAT on Earth that could win in 2020.

13 posted on 01/09/2018 1:02:48 AM PST by Nateman (The louder the left screams , the better it is for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
I'm actually scared of a Oprah Winfrey run. It's the kind of brain dead idolization they would eat up, along with the low information voters.

The voters who elected Obama TWICE?

14 posted on 01/09/2018 1:23:02 AM PST by Does so (McAuliffe's Charlottesville...and...The Walter Duranty Press"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Does so

Yep


15 posted on 01/09/2018 1:39:23 AM PST by Nateman (The louder the left screams , the better it is for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom
Ok, Kevin. How 'bout we just skip the BS and just gourd head with a Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho campaign like the manual said? d;^)
16 posted on 01/09/2018 2:54:48 AM PST by CopperTop (Outside the wire it's just us chickens. Dig?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Are You sure that the zer0 doesn’t have one ?


17 posted on 01/09/2018 3:04:56 AM PST by mabarker1 (Progress- the opposite of congressl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

Black, woman, lesbian. What else do they need?


18 posted on 01/09/2018 3:05:50 AM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

I would like to see CNN do some polls.

“Who do you support for the Democrat nominee...Oprah or Sen. Warren? Oprah or Sen. Sanders...Oprah or Sen. Harris”


19 posted on 01/09/2018 3:13:45 AM PST by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

I heard an excerpt of Oprah’s speech. That highly polished political genius doesn’t know the difference between “persecute” and “prosecute”.


20 posted on 01/09/2018 3:18:48 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Three most annoying words on the internet - "Watch the Video")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson