Replies

That's a great post in his defense, and I appreciate it. But he's a big boy, and is far from meek on his twitter feed, where he's constantly posting pics of some baseball bat wrapped in barbed wire when he's banning people from his threads.

But he can't ban people over here, that I know of. He will have to defend his comments, and predictions in full debate, which he doesn't seem capable of doing. As we see here, he fires off a few weak personal attacks, much more personal than my posts, then goes back into hiding.

I'm not hunting for him in particular, but when he tells us that we are supposed to trust and respect Robert Mueller, I have a very serious disagreement with him. Then when he comes here and attempts to make posts that don't line up with that belief, then he deserves to be questioned on it.

That puts me on the firing line as well, because he has a history here and some dedicated followers, much more than the average poster. But no one is a sacred cow, especially when they want us to put faith in someone who is arresting the President's former staff, and now threatening his family. So I am going to continue to call him out when he makes illogical statements.

If he or his defenders want to debate Robert Mueller, then great, let's do that, and that is all that I am asking. But they don't, they/he want to turn it into a discussion that I am being unfair to him despite his claim that Mueller is a good guy without defending it with evidence.

I have no problem with you good FRiend. Your post was excellent, fair, and honest. I hope you see mine in the same good faith. And I will be careful not to respond to his childish insults re:”second grade” in that same manner, and don't feel that I ever have. As I have told him, I would like to see him return to the board, but if he continues to be in support of Robert Mueller, he should expect some tough questions about it. So far, he's been unable to answer them. Thanks!

I can't blame LS for spending most of his social-media time on Twitter and less of it on FR. LS's follower count on Twitter is massive. Looks like he is on his way towards earning a blue check-mark Verified Status.

Also, his interactions there run the gamut from people reacting negatively and postitively. And he is able to hurl Negan-style insults at those who abuse him, block them, and in turn, not get banned.

LS's Twitter life is awesome.

There is no “defending” a prediction. You just have to let it play out and see who is right.

Personally, I have seen prominent Sessions haters (version of the Mueller haters) BACKING OFF. For example, Jim Jordan (who I think is excellent future Presidential material) is in full retreat now on the Judge Jeanine show last night on FoxTV.

I think these patriots are starting to get “read in” that, in essence, LS has been right all along and the wheels of Justice have been grinding in secrecy.

IF THIS IS CORRECT, I will be interested how may never-Sessions/Rosenstein/Wray/Mueller Freepers will stand tall and eat their words.

If I am wrong, I promise I will do so.

Thanks for your reasoned reply.

Where twitter, reddit and all the other sites are kind of a free-for-all, I see FR in light of our history. We banded together and became the forum this is by the common cause aspects of stopping the Bill Clinton corruption and getting the impeachment accomplished.

That took people working together that would not otherwise have done so. In my opinion, that developed a fellowship aspect that requires much more care in how we exchange on this forum to keep it somewhat unified.

Now, I am not ready to launch into Kumbaya but Admiral Rodgers does make me hum the Battle Hymn of the Republic this morning.