There is no “defending” a prediction. You just have to let it play out and see who is right.
Personally, I have seen prominent Sessions haters (version of the Mueller haters) BACKING OFF. For example, Jim Jordan (who I think is excellent future Presidential material) is in full retreat now on the Judge Jeanine show last night on FoxTV.
I think these patriots are starting to get “read in” that, in essence, LS has been right all along and the wheels of Justice have been grinding in secrecy.
IF THIS IS CORRECT, I will be interested how may never-Sessions/Rosenstein/Wray/Mueller Freepers will stand tall and eat their words.
If I am wrong, I promise I will do so.
Thanks for chiming in. And I will once again say I hope that Mueller is trustworthy, despite a long list of apparent evidence that he’s a snake that has long served as a cover up artist for the deep state.
I saw Jordan last night, and he didn’t retract his call for Sessions to resign, or retract his call for the need for a special counsel to investigate the DOJ, including Uranium One, which appears to implicate Mueller.
What he did say was, thanks to the immense pressure that Nunes and other congressmen, it does appear that there may be a CHANGE that is going on at the DOJ. And there may well be a CHANGE going on, even in Mueller’s investigation, based on the lambasting and microscope review he’s undergoing now. But he clearly bases this possible CHANGE on pressure from Congress, and said that his request for Sessions to resign stands unless he continues to see significant CHANGES.
To further emphasize this point, this would be a CHANGE that post-dates the claims that Mueller was secretly working for Trump from the very start. And it’s not been a “prediction” by LS, it’s been a statement of what supposedly happened when he was first appointed first of May, when there’s no proof there was ever any “secret deal” yet there’s tons of evidence that Sessions was shocked when Mueller was appointed, and Trump was furious. Look at my own tagline that dates back to that time period. So revisionist history on how this may eventually play out isn’t going to work as proof of any secret deal taking place. Thanks!