Posted on 01/05/2018 3:01:05 PM PST by mandaladon
Michael Wolff‘s new book, Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, has set the media ablaze with a series of revelations about the inner-workings of President Donald Trump‘s administration, and attitudes that insiders have towards the 45th president. The White House has dismissed the book as “fantasy” that is full of factual inaccuracies, and Trump’s legal team has threatened to take action. According to Wolff’s own prologue in the book, they may be right.
The prologue reportedly includes the following:
Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.
Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true.
So Wolff flat out says that he believes that at least some of his sources were lying to him, and while he attributes some accounts to their sources, he acknowledges that this isn’t always the case.
This could be problematic for Wolff. He’s being accused of including fiction in what’s presented as a non-fiction book, and he admits that not all of his sources were trustworthy, but he doesn’t specify what’s fact true and what’s false. On its face, this sounds like a classic candidate for a defamation case.
(Excerpt) Read more at lawandcrime.com ...
Hahaha. The guy is a major liar and fool. LOL
It’s almost impossible to pursue this legally in the U.S.
I hope Michael Wolff makes tons of money and Trump sues him and takes it all then gives it to a charity ,LOL
He basically took what people said and then stretched their words to fit his distorted reality.
Even Kitty Jelly wasn’t that stupid
Yeah, he'll be quaking all the way to the bank.
“It’s almost impossible to pursue this legally in the U.S.”
True, I think trying to do anything about this book is a fools errand. They should do their best to discredit it and move on the dummies will buy it and believe it, we will not. It will be forgotten in a month. Bannon will go down in infamy. The MSM is just shameless of course with their sudden admiration for Bannon, the ethics of maggots.
What makes this one guy so special in this department?
To quote the old “Dragnet” show:
“The people you are about to read of are true. Only the facts have been changed to protect the innocent”
Or something like that.
It’s almost impossible to pursue this legally in the U.S.
[Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true. ]
So its unadulterated tabloid trash masquerading as an insiders expose’. Fake but accurate
Try it with the Clintons and see what happens.
Maybe in the U.K.
I find it interesting that Trump helped hype the book, did the author get Trumprickrolled
Little man called Wolff has lied so often no one will believe him when he tells the truth.
It’s the opposite of Dragnet -”The Story You Are About To See Is True. The Names Have Been Changed To Protect The Innocent”
I think of him as a transsexual Kitty Kelly. perhaps he would be more comfortable wearing a fluffy brown wig and high heels.
someone should write a book about Wolffes long history of child molestation.....
I was thinking the same, and I would not be shocked if he was rickrolled by President Trump. Right now all the liberals are buying the bait.... ooops I mean the book.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.