Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zeestephen
This will unravel in the weeks ahead but I believe 'heavily implied' is the closest Graham can come to an outright admission at this point. He is a lawyer after all...
31 posted on 12/29/2017 11:11:56 PM PST by Teflonic (tt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Teflonic

Exactly... he stated that it is the requirement to disclose to the court such things as who paid for a document, immediately after stating his angst regarding how the dossier was used by the FBI... and called for a SC to investigate. So, the friendly spin on this is that he is concerned the DOJ may have known the dossier was bogus and failed to disclose that to the FISA court, and the likely scenario is that he went as far as he legally could without actually stating publicly that the dossier was used to justify the FISA warrant. Only other possibility is that the dossier was presented as evidence to an as yet unrevealed court unrelated to FISA... not even sure what that would be.


37 posted on 12/29/2017 11:22:04 PM PST by leakinInTheBlueSea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson