What the hell are you talking about?
I think the comment refers to the bill being revenue neutral at the federal level.
IOW, 80% are going to see tax cuts, but offsetting features in the legislation mean there’s no actual reduction in revenue flowing to Washington D.C.
Had you wanted to see actual Democrat opposition in full-throated cry, the bill would have actually cut federal revenues, as well. You know — had the bill not lived up to that vaunted establishment notion of “having to pay for” tax cuts.
The truth of the wealth redistribution of the tax reform. What, nobody read the bil before going full tilt for it, huh? Lol... the billions of dollars the people who pay zero, will be much, much, much more. Read the details, instead of the spin version.
There are some great things in it, but it has too much redistribution of middle class money for me. Did you really think Dems voted for something less than their dream tax scheme?
The devil is in the details. And I haven’t even looked at it’s 2027 timeline.
Don’t listen to her. She’s a bitter never-Trumper who can’t get over the primaries.