Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WashPost: Nunes Working on FBI Corruption Report
newsmax.com ^ | 12/25/2015 | Brian Freeman

Posted on 12/26/2017 4:12:31 PM PST by bitt

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and other Republicans are considering writing a report next year alleging corruption at the FBI, The Washington Post has reported.

Such a report would focus on the conduct of FBI officials during the probe into Russia’s meddling in last year’s American presidential election, according to people familiar with the plans.

This comes as President Donald Trump and his supporters in Congress have intensified their attacks on the FBI, which is seen by many as a way to try and discredit special counsel Robert Mueller, the former leader of the bureau, and bring into doubt any findings he may come up with in the Russia election meddling investigation should they be damaging to the Trump administration.

Rep. Adam Schiff, who is the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, explained the GOP plan to CNN’s “State of the Union.”

The Republicans’ “intent here is not to do oversight,” Schiff said. “The intent here is nothing short of discrediting Mueller, then discrediting the Justice Department, then discrediting the FBI, then discrediting the judiciary, should the judiciary convict some of the people that Mueller has charged or may charge in the future," adding that the GOP criticisms are "an effort to tear at the very idea that there is an objective truth."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 115th; adamschiff; california; devinnunes; districtofcolumbia; doj; fbi; fbioutofcontrol; incometaxes; nunes; nunesfbi; russia; schiff; taxcutsandjobsact; taxreform; tcja; trump; trumprussia; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: bitt

The time is now for a grandstand Gowdy letter of concern to somebody.


41 posted on 12/26/2017 7:59:49 PM PST by whistleduck ("....the calm confidence of a Christian with 4 aces".....S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott
Democrats would do themselves a favor by dumping Schiff.

The entire universe would do better by dumping Schiff. What a complete embarrassment he is to himself at this point. He could easily be made into a laughing stock with his idiotic nonsense.

42 posted on 12/26/2017 8:32:42 PM PST by Bullish (Whatever it takes to MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I had a relative at Christmas bring up FBI corruption and this fake Mueller investigation. This person is not a huge partisan, but took notice at how all this appears to be all bunk or corruption.


43 posted on 12/26/2017 10:29:23 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tinamina

Hear what you want, believe what you may. Disinformation is all over the place and all of it did not start until the news of the OIG was presented.


44 posted on 12/27/2017 2:13:12 AM PST by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Doing the job Sessions and Wray refuse to do.

Or, helping them set the stage by having a more independent look-see to validate future actions.....

45 posted on 12/27/2017 4:07:50 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone? I think Trump may give it back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kabar
It's not about names. Robert Mueller has one of the most recognized names in recent DOJ history, but that made him completely inappropriate for a variety of reasons for his appointment. And while I'd love to see someone like Tom Fitton or Larry Klayman, who would seem quite appropriate from their Judicial Watch fame, they would be considered too partisan and biased against certain counterparts.

The only stipulation should be they are not associated with current Washington D.C. politics. A previous state's Attorney General for example, who has a history of cleaning up dirty cops. There are plenty of people out there that they could find who would do an honest and fair job. And that's all we need, since they won't have too dig deep to find rampant corruption staring back at their face.

46 posted on 12/27/2017 6:27:43 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "What the FBI has done is really, really disgraceful, and a lot of people are very angry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
It's not about names.

Au contraire. It matters very much who is named as special counsel or independent prosecutor. And the people whom they select to be part of his/her team. Naming a special prosecutor is predicated on the notion that someone outside the system and partisan politics is necessary in order to achieve a perceived fair result. The history of such appointments does not bode well.

The only stipulation should be they are not associated with current Washington D.C. politics. A previous state's Attorney General for example, who has a history of cleaning up dirty cops. There are plenty of people out there that they could find who would do an honest and fair job.

Most, if not all, state AGs are elected and are members of a political party. Could you provide a name or names of potential candidates?

47 posted on 12/27/2017 6:39:46 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kabar
t matters very much who is named as special counsel or independent prosecutor.

Fame should have nothing to do with it. Most special prosecutors were names that were relatively unknown until their appointment. Find a retired state's AG from a battleground state with a history of jailing cops.

48 posted on 12/27/2017 6:57:27 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "What the FBI has done is really, really disgraceful, and a lot of people are very angry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Naming of a special counsel is a political act and there is no way to insulate it regardless of who is chosen.

Most special prosecutors were names that were relatively unknown until their appointment.

Relatively unknown to whom? The General Public? The political class?

49 posted on 12/27/2017 7:38:14 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I want to see who, when and how these people got their jobs. I suspect most were jOkeass appointees.


50 posted on 12/27/2017 4:34:39 PM PST by depressed in 06 (60 in '18.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson