Posted on 12/26/2017 10:45:55 AM PST by jazusamo
Scientific studies used by the Obama administration to help justify tough environmental regulations are coming under intensifying scrutiny, with critics questioning their merit as the Trump EPA reverses or delays some of those rules.
In one case, agencies determined the research used to prop up a ban on a particular pesticide was questionable. On another front, the Environmental Protection Agency never complied with a congressional subpoena for the data used to justify most Obama administration air quality rules.
EPA regulations are based on secret data developed in the 1990s, Steve Milloy, who served on President Trumps EPA transition team, told Fox News. For the EPA, coming up with cherry-picked data is standard operating procedure.
Milloy, author of Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA, was previously a lawyer for the Securities and Exchange Commission and is among critics who accuse federal agencies of carefully selecting scientific research to fit a political agenda.
Pruitt declares the war on coal is over, argues against governmental overreach, says US is leading with action on climate change.Video
In October, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt issued a directive to ensure that individuals serving on EPA advisory committees dont get EPA grants and are free from potential conflicts of interest.
Whatever science comes out of EPA, shouldnt be political science, Pruitt said in a statement. From this day forward, EPA advisory committee members will be financially independent from the agency.
Environmental groups blasted the decision.
For Pruitt, anything that helps corporate polluters make money is good and science and facts are just roadblocks he wants to tear down, said Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The left loves the idea of science. They just hate actual science.
Thanks jazusamo.
Yep...The 0bama, Reid, Pelosi blatant con job on 0bamacare was fully supported by the enemedia, criminals all.
AAAS is one of the worst offenders. Their “pal” reviewed journal is guilty of publishing fake science.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.