Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Magnum44

I may be overly cynical. My view of Sessions is that he wouldn’t be allowing people to ask questions re Uranium One if there was any danger of people being charged, tried, convicted and going to prison. Look at all the recent, established, unquestionable crimes Hillary has committed. No active investigation. But Jeff has to do something, so he picks a crime that was committed over 7 yrs ago. It just fits the pattern too well.


63 posted on 12/21/2017 1:51:45 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

I hope I am not being overly optimistic. I think when an investigation is ongoing, any crime found can be prosecuted, and there are probably a multitude of them still under any statute of limitations, including the email servers and other crimes. So I think any investigation is a good sign, and I suspect, as it should be, that there is much more going on than we can currently see.


64 posted on 12/21/2017 2:04:49 PM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson