Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Letter https://graphics.axios.com/pdf/letter-to-congressional-committees.pdf?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sendto_newslettertest&stream=top-stories
1 posted on 12/17/2017 3:57:58 PM PST by smileyface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: smileyface

Mueller needs to be investigated - and I’m not talking some spineless House investigation, but a real criminal one - indicted and sent to prison.


2 posted on 12/17/2017 4:04:10 PM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

Unless those emails contain emails like this “Hey Vlad, thanks for hacking the DNC emails for me, the check is in the mail” other than that..Mueller has absolutely NO right to see those emails..this was already when Trump was elected PRESIDENT..he can talk to, have his associates talk to whoever the bloody hell they want to..BEFORE Obama became President, he already had his goons talk to Iran, never heard a peep from the media, apparently it was all good


4 posted on 12/17/2017 4:05:58 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

I wonder why I have not seen this story mentioned in the MSM.


5 posted on 12/17/2017 4:06:07 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

I’m sorry, but Trump’s response was Gibberish.


6 posted on 12/17/2017 4:06:18 PM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

In my personal opinion, this is going to sink the Mueller investigation. Upon reviewing the e-mails and realizing they contained potentially privileged materials, Mueller and his team had the ethical duty to (1) notify the Trump transition, and (2) return the privileged e-mails, unreviewed. Since they did not do that, everything that they have done since that they cannot prove were completely unrelated to their review of these e-mails will be considered “poison fruit.” No prosecutions could be based on it; and any prosecution that occurs would be reversed or dismissed.

I also hope that someone has submitted a bar complaint about this episode.


7 posted on 12/17/2017 4:08:30 PM PST by TheConservator ("The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

How is it legal for the FBI to investigate an alleged crime that they themselves fabricated?


9 posted on 12/17/2017 4:10:43 PM PST by rawcatslyentist ("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

A cancer on our Republic.


10 posted on 12/17/2017 4:10:45 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

“Returning the emails” does nothing but somehow imply that all will be forgiven if they just say they’re sorry.

Trump and his team need to send the criminals to jail. Nothing short of that will stop them—and if they are allowed to keep at it, they will find a time and way to take Trump down.


11 posted on 12/17/2017 4:12:08 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface
"..in the course of our ongoing criminal investigation.."

So is the Rosenweasel/Muellar witch hunt a criminal investigation (for which they have no crime to solve) or a counterintelligence effort?

12 posted on 12/17/2017 4:12:41 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

...There’s no collusion whatsoever. ...
****************
Trump’s finally got it — there can be no collusion unless the communication furthered something illegal, and discussing foreign policy or business transactions with Russians is not illegal. I could have had the Russian ambassador over for dinner and pledged to work to repeal sanctions, and Flynn could have legally done the same. If he lied about doing this, he was an idiot.


14 posted on 12/17/2017 4:14:04 PM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

Mr. President, you’ve given this bullshit charade long enough. Disband it now.


15 posted on 12/17/2017 4:14:50 PM PST by ScottinVA ( Liberals, go find another country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

Maybe The Donald should have hired Hillary’s IT guy. Seems NO ONE can find her emails.


17 posted on 12/17/2017 4:16:09 PM PST by 762X51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface
either the account owner's consent or appropriate criminal process

Sounds like they were pretexted out of the GSA. Also the GSA is no friend of PDJT and might have just given them out 'by error' and error that can't of course be undone. I'm sure there's nothing he can do legally with the emails, but he can leak some either in context or out of context.

Next thing you know, He's going to have Trumps Tax return that every enemy of his wants.

Turnabout is fairplay as the saying goes. Have the oversight committee subpoena Mueller to explain and provide emails between his staff and between himself. Then have the Justice department order him to preserve all work product notes, emails letters in tact and unredacted.

But where is Jeff Sessions? Did he recuse himself from prosecutorial misconduct too?

We know Mueller has expanded the probe into other crimes. This is easily spotted with Rod Rosenstein testimony last week. He couldn't answer the simple question and refused to elaborate, using doublespeak and bureaucraticelese. He was asked over a 6 times directly in as succinct as possible question format.

Refer to: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/deputy-ag-rosenstein-refuses-to-describe-scope-of-russia-probe-in-house-hearing/article/2643357

and do try and listen to the whole questioning session with Lamar Smith.

20 posted on 12/17/2017 4:19:56 PM PST by Fhios (1987: Where's Waldo -- 2017: Where's Jeff Sessions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

Then fire people for we the people that are upset. Enough already.


29 posted on 12/17/2017 4:30:35 PM PST by Brimack34 (Sarah Palin for Vice President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

President Trump needs to throw the PIAPS in his face. If there was prosecutable in the illegal server being used to sell US military secrets and diplomatic access to the highest bedded then there nothing wrong with the Emails from Trump’s team.

If PIAPS can evade the law by simply saying (Despite proof to the contrary) “I didn’t mean to!” then so can President Trump.


30 posted on 12/17/2017 4:37:35 PM PST by Fai Mao (I still want to see The PIAPS in prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corporate Law

ping


39 posted on 12/17/2017 4:56:16 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface
Trump: "My people are very upset" about Mueller obtaining emails

To which Mueller is saying to his investigators: Oh, goody, he's not gonna do anything; let's examine those e-mails for the slightest thing we can use against him. Any mentions of Russia in them?
51 posted on 12/17/2017 5:28:50 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

https://truepundit.com/comey-mueller-ignored-mccabes-ties-to-russian-crime-figures-his-reported-tampering-in-russian-fbi-cases-files/


58 posted on 12/17/2017 5:50:50 PM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smileyface

Fruit from the poisonous tree, so no good in any legal way. At least it shouldn’t be. (Yeh right!). The leakers need to be found and imprisoned for life, or better yet—executed. Then, based on the chain rule used in immigration, destroy their family as well. (But not the pets.) Oh, and then bulldoze their house and property.


60 posted on 12/17/2017 5:58:34 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson