Posted on 12/15/2017 1:10:32 PM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
The FBI released a series of email documents Friday afternoon detailing the Department of Justice response to the fallout of the secret Phoenix tarmac meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in June 2016. The dates on the emails range from July 1-3, 2016. On July 5, 2016, FBI Director James Comey announced former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not face criminal charges for mishandling classified information.
A series of emails show one FBI official, whose name and email are redacted, fuming over leaks to the media about the meeting and what happened on the tarmac. The official received an email from a "layman" alleging a local Phoenix police officer who may have talked to a reporter "sounds like a security threat." Officials went back and forth about finding out if the officer was SWAT or simply worked the motorcade and that "at a minimum" he should never work another detail again. One asked if local law enforcement assisting the FBI on motorcades should sign non-disclosure agreements in the future. Another official called an Observer article about the meeting, with details about how President Clinton got to Lynch's private plane, "infuriating."
Talking points about how to handle the fallout are referenced, but fully redacted.
Another email shows correspondence between senior leadership at the FBI, including former FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, about the developments in the media fallout after the meeting. There are also emails from FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok.
Lynch maintains she only discussed grandchildren and golf with President Clinton during their 30-minute long meeting.
I wonder if it has ever been identified who else was on that plane? If it was just grandkids and golf talk, then there would be no need to have a ‘secret meeting’.....everyone could have listened in with no effort made to tell them to go to ‘the back of the plane for a while’. If on the other hand it was about subject matter that BJ and Lynch didn’t want anyone to know about, one would think they took steps on the plane to make sure that the conversation was private, right?
Jay Sekulow said as much on Hannity a bit ago!
Bttt.
5.56mm
“crooked bass turds!”
When I read the first posting today of the famous tarmac meeting, it was easy to realize that the FBI/DOJ was poed about the leak instead of the flagrant meeting of their two criminal heads.
Later another article confirmed that guess on my part.
How can speaking to a reporter after the fact about a meeting that was supposedly just coincidental and contained only idle chatter about grandkids possibly be “a security threat?”
Best BOL on this thread!
Hmmmm....Now, why would talking points be in need of redaction?
Might be embarrassing to the grand-kids?
This is another prime example of how the Clinton/Obama DOJ/FBI does not protect us. It’s main job is to protect the Deep State thugs, who protect the Clinton/Obama thugs.
Who prosecutes the DOJ AG when HE violates federal law?
Stupid people who get up every morning and DO THE JOB they’ve been assigned, and expect those they employ to do the same.
Yeah, that’s just venting rage.
Seth Rich was murdered ONE WEEK LATER on 10 July 2016..
Isn't it ODD that Seth Rich was MURDERED within ONE WEEK from the most recent date of these FBI emails?
WAS HILLARY SENDING A MESSAGE TO WHISTLE-BLOWERS "LOOK WHAT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU, TOO"????
There are reports on Twitter that Kushner was the publisher of the doc the FBI was concerned about.
Here is one Tweet. @Chillum has many more related Tweets with docs.
https://mobile.twitter.com/chiIIum/status/941783071669522432
.
>> “I swear to God its sounds just like it was out of a Terry Reed book” <<
You need to talk to Terry in person if you think the book was heavy.
.
.
>> “Does it really matter?” <<
Wrong question! “What difference does it make?”
Answer: White House over “house in Chappaqua.”
.
.
>> “Now, why would talking points be in need of redaction?” <<
Because they always reveal that the truth is never in consideration WRT what to tell the public.
.
.
>> How can speaking to a reporter after the fact about a meeting that was supposedly just coincidental and contained only idle chatter about grandkids possibly be “a security threat?” <<
Depends on whose “security” you’re talking about.
.
.
>> “Unless I missed something, we don’t know who the whistleblower was.” <<
Did you miss the “suicide” of the pilot of Loretta’s flight?
.
.
Nothing fictional in Terry’s book.
.
We need a mass arrest of all of the low end players, give them a choice, talk or be sentenced
In a sane world...his replacement.
Enemies of Liberty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.