You’d better explain Strzok’s “insurance policy” against Trump

Hotair.com ^ | 12/14/17 | Ed Morrissey

[a little elbow grease]

(snip) -- Just what did two FBI agents, both of whom ended up on Robert Mueller’s special counsel probe, mean by having an “insurance policy” against a Donald Trump victory? Mueller later removed Peter Strzok when the text messages emerged from their private communications, and Lisa Page had left the probe earlier on her own, but the claim appears to reference a plan in August 2016 to use the power of the FBI to attack a newly elected president. Politico reports that Senate Judiciary chair Chuck Grassley wants answers from Rod Rosenstein ASAP:

(snip) --Question 5 is the big enchilada. Did the FBI really have reason to buy the dossier from Steele on the basis of legitimate counterespionage? Or did Strzok just decide he wanted an “insurance policy” to get Hillary Clinton elected?

[iontheball]

Strzok (sp?) had no reason to believe a private email to his mistress would become public. If he had, he’d never have discussed the insurance policy in the first place. Plus, as your POV confirms, the language was sufficiently vague that he could always claim it was about something else.
______________________________________
Since the computer arrived, the convenience of using it to communicate has enticed and lured many to get lazy and communicate many things that should not be said on a non private medium. You see it happen every day, especially on Internet social platforms. Most crooks do the crime, convinced they are too smart, too slick, and/or too immune to get caught. Think about it, these agents were the law and the law at the highest level of our government. Untouchable Obozo set the eight year corrupt example, bellicose Comey demonstrated every day to his subordinates in the Bureau. No wonder his underlings became convinced they were beyond the law. Now, regarding assassination, there are at least two ways to commit the offense against a President. You could physically kill him or you could politically kill him. I believe the FBI/DOJ cabal opted for a political assassination, and it almost succeeded.

[Fantasywriter]

I’m really leaning towards your conclusion. However, one thing holds me back, and it’s this. From what I have seen, the Deep State leaves nothing to chance. If there’s a threat, it is eliminated, a la Seth Rich.

The dossier plus FISA warrant were strong tools, and maybe they were believed to be foolproof. I don’t quite buy that, however. There is only one foolproof way to eliminate a threat. Just ask Vince Foster...among others.

[iontheball]

There is only one foolproof way to eliminate a threat. Just ask Vince Foster...among others.
___________________________
For sure, physical assassination is the ‘final solution.’

[abclily]

That was the first thing I thought of when I read his statement about the insurance policy. I thought they had discussed assassinating Trump. And that the discussion took place in ‘Andy’s’ office.

[Sparticus]

I’m really leaning towards your conclusion. However, one thing holds me back, and it’s this. From what I have seen, the Deep State leaves nothing to chance. If there’s a threat, it is eliminated, a la Seth Rich.

The dossier plus FISA warrant were strong tools, and maybe they were believed to be foolproof. I don’t quite buy that, however. There is only one foolproof way to eliminate a threat. Just ask Vince Foster...among others.

This would explain why Trump has kept his private security detail.

[Fantasywriter]

Agree.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Has the judge who approved the fisa shown up yet?
My sense is political vs actual physical harm.

[iontheball]

Has the judge who approved the fisa shown up yet?
______________________
Story has gone dead. Hopefully, he is carefully exploring where to bring his recusal problem if it relates to the Flynn FISA intercept.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

So August 2016 Strzok comes up with a plan.

Then on 5/14/17 this guy here “commits suicide” with a suicide note in all capital letters stating only that there was no foul play whatsoever:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3569578/posts?page=1

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

This article states that Peter Smith was trying to retrieve Hillary Clinton’s emails from Russsian hackers, not hack the DNC with Russian hackers:
http://www.truthandaction.org/peter-smith-dead-10-days-after-taking-clinton-email-investigation-public/

[a little elbow grease]

I remember that story. I most likely feel the very same way about it as you do.

Suicide note with parts of it in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. Right!

The Clintons/Obama may be the most plunderous criminals and enemies this country has ever had.

[cynwoody]

True.

But remember to include the rest of the Deep State in the coup attempt, including the IC and the IRS.

[piasa]

Speaking of Iran ...

This Canadian guy and his wife were just found dead under suspicious circumstances; he’s into big pharma AND a big promoter of the Iran deal :

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/canadian-jdl-protesting-billionaire-barry-shermans-fundraising-for-liberals/2015/08/27/

[piasa]

Some judges recused themselves

[AllAmericanGirl44]

I know that, what I’m trying to learn is where the heck the judge who approved the fisa went off to?? I didn’t even realize and keep track until I heard mark levin discussing it! As for the other judge who found Flynn guilty, wth did he recuse himself from the sentencing? So many layers of lies..