Oh Lordy – Senator Johnson Outlines Scope of FBI Officials Sculpting Clinton Exoneration

Senator Ron Johnson sends a letter to current FBI Director Christopher Wray questioning the surrounding investigative details about how the James Comey (July 5th, 2016) exoneration manuscript was changed and sculpted. (Full pdf below)

Within the letter Senator Johnson shares the changes that were made to the manuscript, and asks Wray if FBI officials are aware of who made the changes and why. Prior revelations from within an ongoing IG report showed FBI Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok participating in both the investigation of Hillary Clinton, and changing some of the manuscript to shape the narrative away from criminal conduct and toward Clinton’s favor.

Earlier information showed, via text messages with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, the scope of FBI Agent Strzok’s partisan efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election due to his personal political bias. Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe appeared to be coordinating together on the Clinton investigation toward a united outcome. Director James Comey delivered that outcome to the American electorate.

Essentially today Senator Johnson is asking current FBI Director Wray if he is aware of any further FBI officials that would have also participated in this coordinated effort; and what measures Director Wray is taking to look into the ‘matter’:

“One wonders just what limitations someone like Strzok would consider appropriate when facilitating an “insurance policy?””

My guess is they planned to use the GPS Fusion dossier to get FISA warrants and hope to get some dirt on Trump via phone taps. Failing that, perhaps leak the dossier directly (more risky option).

The irony of all this is: if Mueller hadn’t been appointed Special Council, and Strzok hired by Mueller, we would have never known about any of this.

The OIG would have found the texts, and Strzok likely would have been moved to “Personnel”, but without Hill pressure, none of this would ever have been made public (and Mueller et al. stalled for months before disclosing why Strzok was moved).

Before the “insurance policy” meeting, McCabe was being looked at merely for “conflict of interest” over his wife’s political campaign, and likely would have been “exonerated”. Now, we know the “insurance policy meeting” was in his office, and McCabe is not going to walk away from this.

Also, Strzok and GF were using burner phones specifically to communicate info about Clinton. Given their amazing recklessness on what they put on their work phones, what they put on their burner phones was almost certainly criminal - and we are going to likely find out what that was as well !

whoever it was was sounding like he was basically throwing in the towel- still gonna go ahead with the subpoenas, but then only say “Oh well folks, we tried, but they refused to give us the answers we sought, and now we’re powerless to do anything about it- but don’t hate us for it- We certainly tried out best’

I just re-watched Tucker's opening. It was Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Chairman of the Senate's Homeland Security Committee.

Before I even watched, I knew it had to be a Republican because who else would appear so wimpy, "when push came to shove."

This is what we have representing us. God help us.

“My guess... “

Your guess seems to me the product of something increasingly rare at FR, reason.

Thanks Rev.

Also, on a more serious note:

A Reverend, a Buddhist and an Muslim walk straight into a bar...

...thus ending their debate over who best understands the concept of limbo in a three-way posthumous tie.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.