Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdnaMode

Exactly..and for those saying that Mo Brooks would have easily won..yeah for sure..til they found some women who said he sexually harassed them, then he LOSES


1,407 posted on 12/12/2017 7:19:01 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1392 | View Replies ]


To: Sarah Barracuda

Yeah, I’m sure this would have happened. This has been the plan all along. This #MeToo movement is becoming dangerous. Most people seem to believe the women, no matter what. Even 40 years later.


1,454 posted on 12/12/2017 7:22:25 PM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1407 | View Replies ]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Here’s the big difference, Moore went out with some younger women when he was 30 & someone told the dems. They used that to create a whole series of false accusations. It only worked because Moore at 30 went out with some girls who were17-18.

Mo Brooks, I would assume never dated young women when he was 30. Of course Moore was innocent of any wrong doing, but because of the dating back then, the dems were able to creats this huge sexual harassment sham. In retrospect the whole Weinstein story breaking when it did, was part of the set up of Moore. Weinstein was known to be a predator for years, but they broke that story, then the floodgates opened on sexual misconduct.. All part of the Moore set up The senate seat for the dems was what all this sexual misconduct news was about.


1,526 posted on 12/12/2017 7:26:27 PM PST by Beatthedrum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1407 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson