Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah Barracuda

Here’s the big difference, Moore went out with some younger women when he was 30 & someone told the dems. They used that to create a whole series of false accusations. It only worked because Moore at 30 went out with some girls who were17-18.

Mo Brooks, I would assume never dated young women when he was 30. Of course Moore was innocent of any wrong doing, but because of the dating back then, the dems were able to creats this huge sexual harassment sham. In retrospect the whole Weinstein story breaking when it did, was part of the set up of Moore. Weinstein was known to be a predator for years, but they broke that story, then the floodgates opened on sexual misconduct.. All part of the Moore set up The senate seat for the dems was what all this sexual misconduct news was about.


1,526 posted on 12/12/2017 7:26:27 PM PST by Beatthedrum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1407 | View Replies ]


To: Beatthedrum

Wouldn’t take much for some woman to be paid off to say that Mo Brooks harassed them, seriously it would be that easy. Republicans need to use the same Dem playbook and accuse Democrats of doing the same thing


1,712 posted on 12/12/2017 7:43:46 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1526 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson