Posted on 12/12/2017 9:23:06 AM PST by Helicondelta
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, accused President Donald Trump of slut-shaming Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand when he attacked the New York Democrat in a tweet on Tuesday morning.
A day after Gillibrand, widely considered a potential 2020 presidential candidate, called for Trump's resignation, the president claimed the senator used to "do anything" for campaign donations from him. Trump concluded his verbal lashing by calling Gillibrand "used" and "very disloyal" to the Clintons, apparently referring to Gillibrand's recent statement that former President Bill Clinton should have left office following his affair with Monica Lewinsky in the 1990s.
"Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office 'begging' for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!" Trump wrote.
Warren rushed to Gillibrand's defense, accusing the president of attempting to "bully, intimidate, and slut-shame" the senator.
"Are you really trying to bully, intimidate and slut-shame @SenGillibrand? Do you know who you're picking a fight with? Good luck with that, @realDonaldTrump. Nevertheless, #shepersisted," Warren wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
Sounds like Warren rushed to imply that Gillibrand’s interest in campaign donations from Trump might be somewhat slutty. Is Gillibrand going to stand by and allow Warren to insult her like that?
Mustn’t one actually be a slut to be slut shamed? Isn’t Pocahontas calling the senator a slut? Trump certainly did not.
It sounds like Sen. Warren has a bit of a potty mouth.
Looks like Warren is shooting an arrow across the bow of Silly Gilly's presidential ambitions.
Trump didn’t call her a slut....lieawatha did
There’s been a strong trend in feminism to attack anyone who criticizes any aspect of any woman’s appearance or behavior, especially in relation to even the slightest hint of or allusion to sexuality.
The movement against “slut shaming” includes demonstrations and marches, feverish articles, etc.
Then, as in the case of POTUS Trump’s tweet, even if one makes no reference at all to a woman’s appearance or sexual behavior, you can be accused of “slut shaming” because the feminazis will claim there is some faint allusion to slut shaming hidden somewhere in your words.
Slut? Wow these people are going insane right in front of our eyes.
What is it now? Slut a good or bad thing to warren? It is hard for me to keep track at times.
Vice channel has a ad out now... Sex, Drugs is advertised for some show, so slut is a good thing faux-beaver?
I cannot believe that this poor woman has any traction in politics.
Since Trump didn’t say anything about Gillibrand doing something sexual, it’s actually Warren who seems to be making that accusation and “slut shaming” her.
LOL!
I don’t think Trump is afraid of the angry lezzy b!tch.
She’s got the cheekbones for it.
If true?
LOL!
5.56mm
Any relation to the Corning family? (glass company)
CC
NO, Erastus Corning was a Democrat Mayor who was like Boss Corning, like so many other corrupt mayors for Life.
I could have passed my remaining years peacefully without ever seeing that image.
I almost shot my computer screen.
I don’t care about their outrage anymore. Outrage is their normal operating mode. Outraged over granola, outraged over nuclear holocaust. And everything in between? They’re outraged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.