So, by your own admission you don't know what was said, but you assume he acted like a "slime ball" without any evidence.
I can think of a couple scenarios where simply broaching the topic, even with carefully chosen language, could be misconstrued. A lot of people think "surrogacy" implies sexual intercourse with the surrogate. That is not going to result in his wife's embryo being implanted in the surrogate.
I reserve judgement (condemnation) until I see the evidence of impropriety.
I said I don’t believe him cause hes a Politician and for me thats a good enough reason for me.
Like they say how do you know a Politician (lawyer) is lying. Their lips move .
“. A lot of people think “surrogacy” implies sexual intercourse with the surrogate. That is not going to result in his wife’s embryo being implanted in the surrogate”
Depends on the instrument used for implantation.