Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: springwater13; LS; Lazamataz; Liz; butterdezillion
*PING* to the thread, folks!

1) If there is anything that needs redacting, isn't that prima facie evidence of a crime? I was under the impression these were private devices, not work devices, hence not secure, hence anything redactable is a no-no. And even if the devices are secure, the app used to pass them, likely isn't, if they were mixing work and (ahem) pleasure on the app.

2) 10,000 texts over several months? That's, say, 2400 texts a month over 4 months; or 80 texts a day. When did they find time to work between texting and screwing?

3) Double check to see if either has had any *other* extramarital affairs.

23 posted on 12/06/2017 3:33:03 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

“””10,000 texts over several months? That’s, say, 2400 texts a month over 4 months; or 80 texts a day. When did they find time to work between texting and screwing?”””


The public needs know the full contents. We paid them to work and not sext. Hang both by the tallest tree.


44 posted on 12/06/2017 3:49:40 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

2) They are leftists. They viewed those as their work.


118 posted on 12/06/2017 6:07:56 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyonse's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson