Posted on 12/04/2017 9:53:28 AM PST by x1stcav
You do not need to be under oath when be questioned by the FBI. If you lie to them in conversation, you are guilty of a crime.
Because Peter Strzok, the demoted fired biased Mueller FBI agent, was the one who interviewed Hillary. FOR REAL!!!!!
Not under oath, not videoed. And Strzok was one of the guys who reviewed comey’s draft exoneration. BEFORE he interviewed her. He already knew the script.
This guy needs a lamp post bad.
She at least lied about her emails.
P.S. Source is daily caller, today.
If you lie to an FBI agent it doesn't matter if you are under oath or not! "Because it is a crime to lie to federal agents. It's called Making False Statements and it is a federal crime; Section 1001 of Title 18. Martha Stewart, Bernie Madoff, and Scooter Libby are all individuals who have been convicted of this."
Stick it in your ear. I was merely reporting what Comey did.
Now the other bag needs to be convicted.
5 Then the people of Nineveh believed in God; and they called a fast and put on sackcloth from the greatest to the least of them. 6 When the word reached the king of Nineveh, he arose from his throne, laid aside his robe from him, covered himself with sackcloth and sat on the ashes. 7 He issued a proclamation and it said, “In Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles: Do not let man, beast, herd, or flock taste a thing. Do not let them eat or drink water. 8 But both man and beast must be covered with sackcloth; and let men call on God earnestly that each may turn from his wicked way and from the violence which is in his hands. 9 Who knows, God may turn and relent and withdraw His burning anger so that we will not perish.” 10 When God saw their deeds, that they turned from their wicked way, then God relented concerning the calamity which He had declared He would bring upon them. And He did not do it.
Mueller ,Mueller, Mueller
Has there ever been a time in history where the government has set up an interrogation office like Meuller has. It is almost , hate to say it, gestapo like. His team can haul in anybody they want and interrogate/ question them for hours and or days even if they’ve done nothing wrong. Just the process can financially ruin people lives.
You don't have to be under oath. The law says you have to be truthful whenever you're being questioned by a LEO acting in an official capacity.
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001 makes it a crime to: 1) knowingly and willfully; 2) make any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation; 3) in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the United States. (See: Why YOU should Never Lie-Especially to an Agent of the Federal Government
bkmk
Yes, quite a few people have straightened me out on this. The glaring hypocrisy of Hillary getting away with lying is incredible.
BTW, Ol’ Dan Tucker... You’re too late to come for supper! :)
Millions of us need to ask this same question, in every contact with the media, or any Government official, until it becomes impossible to ignore!
Well, maybe if Mr. President appointed an Attorney General with a spine, she would be charged?
Sorry, but it’s not 2015, you can’t act like some external entity is still responsible for Hillary not being charged.
No, “being under oath” only matters if they wanted to charge her with perjury. “Making false statements” to law enforcement is a separate crime, and it covers ANY false statement, under oath or otherwise:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.