The Washington Post is pushing hate propaganda against whites and anyone concerned about illegal immigrant criminality.
This is journalistic malpractice of the worst kind.
Yes, I’m white. And I’m a Nationalist. So?
If you don’t like illegal aliens killing your neighbors, you’re a Nazi (at least how we define Nazis).
I’d rather be deplorable than acceptable to the left.
Black Americans are regularly victimized by illegals.
Does WaPo not know this?
“White nationalists angered by Mexican immigrant’s acquittal in Kate Steinle’s killing.”
Real American citizens angered by MURDERING, ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL Mexican border jumper aquittal in Kate Steinle’s murder.
There. Fixed it.
To the left:
Ignoring/questioning judicial FIAT of the tyrants of the SCOTUS about men in girls bathrooms is a massive breach of the law. Or abortion at any time for any reason.
Ignoring a law passed by the congress/senate and signed by a president per the process set in the US Constitution - your are a RACIST!
Well yes, I’m white, and yeah, I kind of like my country.
I am not, however, a blithering piece of shit newspaper.
The writers at the Washington Compost think that anybody who does not believe their positions is a (insert horrible word here).
This is called information warfare, folks. They call you names because it sometimes works. It worked when you were on the Kindergarten playground and they are hoping the same thing will happen when you are an adult.
Ignore the name calling, folks and continue to fight against these horrible people. We are stronger in numbers.
JoMa
I’ll be a white nationalist then. WINNING!
Save the seals!
Mexican immigrant
This guy was a Mexican illegal alien who had been deported several times because he had no right to be here. He isn’t an ‘immigrant’.
The left uses labels to divide not realizing that they are in fact uniting people - us against them.
FIVE times deported illegal aliens could not be immigrants except by deliberate obfuscation.
The government has removed him FIVE times. He is a WELL documented illegal alien.
The illegal alien apologists didn’t waste any time at the WaPo but all they did was to get that once significant paper laughed at. The issue is about murder and whether one of the privileges of being in a Protected Class is getting away with it. Apparently if you have a problem with that, you’re a Nazi. Or not. Because nobody intelligent listens to them anymore anyway.
The only ones who think it is a real newspaper, instead of the Leftist propaganda talking-points fish wrap it actually is, are the people in Washington DC and the liberals.
What do we care what these people have to say?
I live in rural Florida and I certainly don't read it.
And I don't care what kinds of names they call me. I am who I am and they don't give me my identity.
Having said that, they at least exposed their extreme liberal bias.
And they revealed who their enemies are. Me and youse guys on FR.
White nationalists?
You mean the people who grew up as well as their ancestors in a 85+% white nation?
Ya know before the leftists turned this country in to a 3rd word sh*t hole?
Those nationalists?
Ridiculous. This actually has nothing to do with Hispanics or anything other than the refusal by the City of San Francisco to enforce immigration policy. And the City has gotten away scot-free.
We can build all the walls we want and pass all the new laws we want, but as long as localities are permitted to simply flout federal law on this, nothing is going to change.
I’m white. I love my country. I think the Kate Steinle verdict is a disgrace and a travesty.
I guess I fit the profile.
Juror Explains Verdict in Murder Trial
This week, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, the man who shot and killed Kate Steinle in 2015, was acquitted of all homicide-related charges (murder, manslaughter, negligent homicide) by a San Francisco jury. The sole charge on which jurors could agree he was guilty was “illegal possession of a firearm.”
Speaking “off-the-record,” Juror X explained that “the fact that the defendant had previously been deported five times persuaded us that he was not really responsible for killing Ms. Steinle. On the one hand, several jurors blamed the government for inciting Mr. Garcia’s rage. Being repeatedly forced to sneak into the country at great effort drove him to live outside the law. Such a lifestyle entails risky behavior like carrying the weapon he carelessly fired into a crowd of shoppers and tourists at a waterfront pier. If our country’s borders were open Mr. Garcia would have been allowed to legally enter and would not have had to join the criminal underworld.”
“Other jurors blamed the lack of gun control,” Juror X continued. “If no one were allowed to have a gun it wouldn’t have been possible for Mr. Garcia to shoot anyone and Ms. Steinle would still be alive. It was felt that it would be unfair to lay all of the blame on Mr. Garcia when it is right-wing politicians who have blocked sensible gun confiscation. Logically, then, since in a sane society it would have to be illegal for anyone to have possession of a firearm, we were able to reach a consensus that convicting Mr Garcia of that charge would lead to the most just outcome that was within our power to bestow.”
“All of us agreed that Ms. Steinle’s death was a tragic accident,” Juror X added. “Mr. Garcia had no intent to kill her or anyone else. He was just blowing off steam. She, unfortunately, was in the wrong place at the wrong time. She wasn’t murdered. As a woman she couldn’t have been man-slaughtered. And negligent homicide would be a failure to use the care that a normally careful person would. Well, Mr. Garcia is not a normal person. He is a former felon and cannot be held to the same standard that a law-abiding, noncriminal person should be held.”
San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee called the verdict “a clear vindication of our sanctuary policy. It sends a message to all those living in fear of being mistreated by federal immigration goons that they can come to our city and be protected by our laws and, as the decision by this enlightened and socially progressive jury has shown, by the citizens of San Francisco.”
semi-news/semi-satire from https://azconservative.org/2017/12/02/juror-explains-verdict-in-murder-trial/