Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: enumerated; kjam22

You might be interested to know that LS posted this article on his twitter yesterday, and said quote “it wouldn’t surprise him” if it were true, even though it flies completely in the face of the theory that Trump and Mueller are secretly working together:

https://mobile.twitter.com/LarrySchweikart/status/936220038498942977

Breaking: Trump’s FBI Director & Solicitor General Preparing Indictments Of The ‘Untouchables’…

https://conservativepost.com/breaking-trumps-fbi-director-solicitor-general-preparing-indictments-of-the-untouchables-they-are-panicking/

(Excerpted)

Very soon the names Christopher Wray and Noel Francisco will be the stars of 24/7-cable news programming. Both are Trump appointees who have compiled enough evidence to begin the prosecution of the Clintons and those in the highest offices of the FBI who protected them.

Wray was Trump’s choice to replace Comey to lead the FBI after Trump became aware of how severely Comey, and his predecessor Robert Mueller, had corrupted the agency and its mission when it chose to protect the Clintons. Francisco will be prosecuting the case against those who corrupted the FBI and his reputation says that he will do it thoroughly and professionally to the best of his considerable legal abilities.

Under Mueller, the FBI buried overwhelming evidence of Russian bribery, extortion, kickbacks and money laundering as the nuclear power sought to gain control of the world’s uranium supply.

Mueller also saw no reason to investigate when Hillary, with the approval of then president Obama, helped Russia make a major technological leap after they authorized sharing information technologies to help build the Russian equivalent of Silicon Valley in Skolkovo.

Wray also has enough evidence to convict his predecessor, Jim Comey, on conspiracy charges for his involvement in refusing to prosecute Hillary, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, and a number of her other associates on violations of the Espionage Act. Wray has likely determined that those 33,000 deleted emails weren’t just mishandled accidently – alone that is a violation of the act – but were deliberately exposed to foreign agents and contained at least 2,100 highly secret transmissions.

The depths of their criminality and their treasonous actions apparently left Obama and Clinton with little choice but to try to destroy President Trump. Now, in the interest of defending our American republic Christopher Wray has no choice but to take them all down.

In the next six months expect indictments against former FBI directors Robert Mueller and James Comey along with current Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and former U.S. attorney and current Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein.


130 posted on 12/01/2017 9:03:36 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle; kjam22

Yeah, I read that article and found it interesting.

My take on this whole thing is:

1) That the true agenda in DOJ, congress, intelligence bureaus, Mueller’s team, the deep state, etc., is a crazy mixture of every motivation from CYA, to political witch hunt, to honest law enforcement, to blackmail, to let the chips fall where they may. I don’t know which element will prevail or whether it will be a vague and unresolved mess.

2) That there is far, far more guilt on the Leftist, Democrat side of the political equation. That if any of these investigations lead anywhere they will lead to Democrat wrongdoings, even if they are mostly trying to avoid just that. So, I think either it all fizzles out or some big Democrats take the fall. Probably the fizzle is more likely. In any case, I’m not and have never been real concerned about Mueller bringing Trump down. Even if he hates Trump, I think he’s more likely to find dirt on the Democrat side, or none at all. Why? Because I think Trump is innocent.

3) I have zero interest in discussing whether a certain FReeper was right or wrong in statements made about this months ago. The people now saying “I told you so” tend to mischaracterize, misquote, exaggerate and/or oversimplify past exchanges in order to make it appear as if they were so right and he was so wrong.

I see a lot of straw man arguments and loaded questions and ad hominem attacks. For example, I don’t remember anyone saying there was a love fest between Trump and Mueller, that they were secretly BFFs. - only that his investigation was likely to lead to Democrats being indicted due to the amount of Democrat guilt. Yet, people keep making these straw man arguments and posing loaded questions like “Do you still believe Trump and Mueller are secretly BFFs?” Who ever said they were BFFs in the first place?

I still think the idea that Mueller’s investigation is unlikely to harm Trump and more likely to bring down a bunch of Democrats is sound for the reasons stated above.

I’ll leave it at that.


139 posted on 12/01/2017 10:00:01 AM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson