To: Alberta's Child
...but a locking device that trapped someone in the office would seem to be a clear violation of even a half-assed building code. I'm quite certain that the building code violation was not even a consideration. The purpose of the device was to support predation - I have no doubt that it was against code never even entered their minds.
63 posted on
11/30/2017 7:56:12 AM PST by
MortMan
(I can resist anything, except temptation. /sarc)
To: MortMan
The point is that Matt Lauer didn’t install it himself. Someone else had to do that, and that contractor or building custodian would likely know about things like a building code that Lauer and his enablers didn’t care about.
64 posted on
11/30/2017 8:06:01 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson